Category Archives: DDoS Criminals

DDoS Attacks With BillGates Linux Malware Intensify

XOR botnet authors migrate to using BillGates malware Over the past six months, security researchers from Akamai’s SIRT team have observed a shift in the cyber-criminal underground to using botnets created via the BillGates malware to launch massive 100+ Gbps DDoS attacks. The BillGates malware is a relatively old malware family aimed at Linux machines running in server environments. Its primary purpose is to infect servers, link them together in a botnet controlled via a central C&C server, which instructs bots to launch DDoS attacks at their targets. The malware has been around for some years and due to its (irony-filled) name is probably one of the most well-known Linux-targeting malware families. Former XOR botnet operators reverted to using BillGates A BillGates botnet is capable of launching Layer 3, 4, and 7 DDoS attacks. More accurately it supports ICMP floods, TCP floods, UDP floods, SYN floods, HTTP floods and DNS reflection floods. According to Akamai’s Security Intelligence Research Team (SIRT), ever since the XOR DDoS botnet , also Linux-based, has been neutralized a few months back, hacking outfits have switched to the BillGates botnet for their attacks. While not as powerful as the XOR botnet, which was capable of launching 150+ Gbps attacks, BillGates attacks can go over 100 Gbps when needed. Moreover, as Akamai noticed, the hacking crew that deployed the XOR botnet has also switched to using BillGates malware, the CDN and cyber-security provider seeing DDoS attacks on the very same targets the XOR botnet crew was previously attacking. Most BillGates DDoS attacks targeted Asian online gaming servers DDoS attacks launched with this botnet have were seen  targeting  Asia-based companies and their digital properties, mostly located in online gaming. Besides the original XOR crew, the malware has been used to build different botnet by multiple gangs and has even been used as the base for other Linux-based DDoSing malware. The BillGates malware is available for purchase on underground hacking forums, and it comes in the form of a “malware builder” which allows each crew to generate its own strand, that can run on different C&C servers. Last June , Akamai observed a similar spike in DDoS attacks coming from botnets built with the BillGates malware. Source: http://news.softpedia.com/news/ddos-attacks-with-billgates-linux-malware-intensify-502697.shtml

See the original article here:
DDoS Attacks With BillGates Linux Malware Intensify

Hacker Faces 10 Years for DDoS Attacks and Sex Toy Pranks in DOJ Crackdown

A nonymous’s repeated attacks on Donald Trump since December of 2015 have made hacker harassment a part of everyday conversation. Today, the United States Department of Justice handed down a sentence to a member of the Electronik Tribulation Army (ETA) that shows just how severe the punishment for those types of hacks can be. Benjamin Earnest Nichols, a 37-year-old ETA member from Oklahoma City, pled guilty to intentionally causing damage with a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack on mcgrewsecurity.com in 2010. Nichols hasn’t been sentenced yet, but faces a maximum of 10 years in federal prison and a $250,000 fine. It’s the DDoS attack that put Nichols in court, but the list of other things he admits to doing range from costly to downright dirty: causing $6,500 in losses to McGrew Security because of a downed website, making disparaging remarks and insulting McGrew (owner of the attacked website and security service), photoshopping images of McGrew, and sending sex toys to McGrew’s home. The exact type of sex toys were not mentioned in the U.S. Attorney’s Office press release. Regardless, it’s the type of behavior hacking groups have made a name doing. It’s also behavior that the U.S. DOJ plans on stopping. McGrew became a target of the ETA because of his role in the arrest of Jesse McGraw, the leader of the hacker group, back in 2009. McGraw was arrested after he installed malware and a remote-access program on dozens of computers at the North Central Medical Plaza in Dallas. He planned to use the medical computers for a DDoS attack on a rival hacker group, but was stopped before anything came of his tampering. He was sentenced to nine years in federal prison in 2011. It was one of the first major cybercrime sentences given, and the hacking community still mentions the decision’s importance. After McGraw’s arrest, Nichols and two other ETA members turned their eyes on McGrew. “They set up a website in my name to pose as me, and put up embarrassing content or things they though would embarrass me, including a call-to-action to buy sex toys, and fake pornographic images,” McGrew told Wired in 2010. “They harvest email addresses from the university I work at and emailed it out to those.” McGrew was a key witness against McGraw, so the FBI got involved. They raided Nichols’ home because his actions were “affecting a potential witness in an official proceeding,” the search warrant affidavit read. The search warrant lists Nichols as going by the names “thefixer25,” ”fixer,” “fix,” ”c0aX,” and “ballsdeep.” Witness intimidation is a federal crime. The ETA responded by posting the following on its website: “On the 23rd of June 2010 the Federal Bureau of Investigation issued search warrants on ETA members. All their computers and electronic devices have been taken for forensic investigation…. We are not terrorists, we are freedom fighters and cyber protesting is not illegal.” Back in 2009, when McGraw was arrested, ETA members were hyper aware of how they could be next. When Nichols was asked if he was still in the ETA in an email from another member, he responded: “Right now admissal (sic) of any kind like that is certainly what some douchebag prosecutor would like. I cannot give you that answer when you ask me outright, however.” Nichols also said that he wiped his computers. Turns out he didn’t wipe them well enough, and can look forward to big time for his hacking crimes. It’s a message from the DOJ to the hacking community that it surely won’t ignore. Source: https://www.inverse.com/article/13891-hacker-faces-10-years-for-ddos-attacks-and-sex-toy-pranks-in-doj-crack

Read the article:
Hacker Faces 10 Years for DDoS Attacks and Sex Toy Pranks in DOJ Crackdown

Over half of companies feel investment in DDoS protection is justified

A quarter of all companies risk their business-critical systems due to a lack of anti-DDoS protection according to new research by Kaspersky Lab. It’s the kind of absence that can cause enterprises massive financial loss and reputational damage and, according to the research, more than half of companies feel that investing in protection against DDoS attacks is justified. About the same number of survey respondents from telecoms (82 percent) and finance (78 percent) think anti-DDoS protection is an important cyber-security requirement for infrastructure. Just shy of a quarter (24 percent) of respondents don’t use DDoS protection or only use it part of the time (41 percent). Only 34 percent of companies are fully protected against the threat. A majority of companies with no anti-DDoS protection are the ones attacked the most often such as media (36 percent), healthcare and education (both 31 percent). A quarter of companies stated that the stability of business-critical systems is a priority for their organisation, however only 15 percent plan to implement anti-DDoS protection in the near future. “It’s important to take DDoS attacks seriously as they can be just as damaging to a business as any other cyber-crime, especially if used as part of a bigger targeted attack. Organisations must understand that protection of the IT infrastructure requires a comprehensive approach and continuous monitoring, regardless of the company’s size or sphere of activity,” said Russ Madley, head of B2B at Kaspersky Lab. Source: http://www.scmagazineuk.com/over-half-of-companies-feel-investment-in-ddos-protection-is-justified/article/487567/

Read More:
Over half of companies feel investment in DDoS protection is justified

Notorious pro-US hacker Jester diverts DoS attack towards Israeli spy service Mossad

A high-profile US hacker has turned an attack on his website into an assault against the Israeli intelligence service. ‘The Jester’ – or th3j35t3r – claims that he diverted an attempt to overload his website to assault Mossad’s online presence. Haaretz reported that Jester’s website – jesterscourt.cc – was the victim of a denial of service (DoS) attack on the night of 1 April. In a tweet, Jester announced that he had diverted the hacker’s attack by simply changing the IP address his website was registered on. When asked why he picked Mossad by one of his 74,400 Twitter followers, Jester replied “Because they can look after themselves perfectly well.” On his blog, Jester claims to have used this technique before. In a post called Offensive Counter Measures – Be Like Water, Jester details the steps he took to divert another DoS attack, which he alleges was carried out by Anonymous, towards websites linked with the Occupy movement. According to Haaratz, Israel’s Information and Communications Technology Authority said Mossad’s website had not seen any irregularities or disruptions of service. At the time of writing, Mossad’s website was working, but IBTimes UK could not confirm whether it had suffered any downtime. However, The Jester’s website was not working. Anti-ISIS, anti-Anonymous Jester is one of the hacking community’s most high-profile members. What is a DoS attack? During a denial of service (DoS) or a distributed denial of service (DoS) attack, hackers attempt to overload a website’s connections by sending in data requests from multiple sources. Most often hackers use a ‘botnet’ – internet-connected PCs that are compromised by malware – to send in the requests to visit the site, without the users’ knowledge. The huge number of requests, which can reach thousands per second, overload the ability of a website’s server to respond, eventually causing an error message to appear instead of the site’s pages. Making a DDoS is relatively simple. Botnets are available to hire on websites not reachable via search engines (deep web) or on encrypted websites (the dark web). Jester’s career as a vigilante hacker appears to have started in 2010, when he claimed to have been involved in an attack on the Wikileaks website. That year, the New York Times reported Jester was a a former military contractor who had worked with US special forces. Since then, Jester has developed a reputation as a pro-US hacker vigilante and cybersecurity expert. Through writing his own blog on cybersecurity, he gives talks on the subject through text chat to keep his identity a secret, and is known for attacking websites linked to Hamas and Islamic State (Isis). Jester has also attacked websites used by the Occupy movement and Anonymous – whom he described as “pathetic terrorist sympathizing buttholes”. He claims to have caused more than 180 websites to go offline since 2010. Jester was listed as one of Time magazine’s “most influential people on the internet” in March 2015. Source: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/notorious-pro-us-hacker-jester-diverts-dos-attack-towards-israeli-spy-service-mossad-1552895

Link:
Notorious pro-US hacker Jester diverts DoS attack towards Israeli spy service Mossad

The Anonymous ‘war’ on Donald Trump is a complete disaster

The “total war” that Anonymous declared earlier this month against Donald Trump has quickly devolved into a civil war among hackers fighting within the group and pro-Trump supporters who are trolling them within their chat rooms. In early March, hackers affiliated with Anonymous tried to reboot their Operation Trump campaign by calling for everyone to take down Trump’s websites in a coordinated effort on April 1. Almost immediately, the initiative was criticized by people within Anonymous as irresponsible and “cringeworthy,” but a dedicated group apparently moved on with the plan. It’s April 1: Many of the GOP frontrunner’s sites are still standing, there are now two competing OpTrump chat rooms with totally different missions, and one of them has been flooded with pro-Trump supporters and others leaving trolling comments like “Hitler did nothing wrong.” In short: The so-called war seems to be a complete disaster. ‘A mess is happening’ It’s unclear when the split between Anonymous factions occurred, but it seems to have happened sometime after a hacker named Beemsee, who has been leading the original OpTrump effort, released a new statement claiming that attacking Trump’s websites was all a ruse for publicity around April Fools’ Day. “There is no DDoS,” Beemsee and two other hackers wrote, using the acronym for a distributed denial-of-service attack, a tactic used to overload a website. “It’s only purpose was to gain attention, which this Operation needs. … the point of this Operation is not to attack Donald Trump. Instead, it is going to try to give citizens some insight.” Beemsee and their cohorts say in their statement that people should try and capture “the darker nature of Trump’s supporters” and post it on social media sites with hashtags like #OpTrump and #Trump2016. But a hacker called AnonymousLoyalist disagreed. In a competing statement, the hacker wrote that they moved to a “far more organized channel, which has already seen unsurprisingly large amounts of success.” That channel is #OpTrump2016, but it was unclear exactly what that success boiled down to. When Tech Insider viewed the #OpTrump2016 chat room on Friday, it was an unorganized mess. Most Anonymous chat rooms are moderated in some way, and people usually get kicked out for spamming or posting nonsense. But it appeared to be flooded with trolls intent on calling them children, “social justice warriors,” and, more often than not, homophobic slurs. “A mess is happening,” wrote one user in #OpTrump, expressing a shared frustration among others in Beemsee’s chat room. The ‘war’ goes on It was clear on Friday that at least some of Trump’s websites were indeed under cyberattack. The website CitizensForTrump.com is currently unreachable, and the site for Trump’s hotels brought up an error for a few seconds before pulling up a cached version powered by CloudFlare, a service that protects from attacks like this. Anonymous may be able to bring down some of Trump’s unprotected websites, but it will almost certainly come back online after a few hours or days. And many of his other sites are probably not at risk at all, since Tech Insider previously spoke with CloudFlare CEO Matthew Prince, and he wasn’t particularly worried. “DDoS attacks are not particularly sophisticated cyber attacks,” Prince said. “They are sort of the functional equivalent of a caveman with a club.” A representative for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Tech Insider, but spokeswoman Hope Hicks previously told Tech Insider: “The government and law-enforcement authorities are seeking the arrest of the people responsible for attempting to illegally hack Mr. Trump’s accounts and telephone information.” Depending on who you believe in Anonymous, the plan is a coordinated DDoS attack or a social-media shaming campaign against Trump’s supporters. But Beemsee left open the possibility of something else, perhaps an actual way to take over one of their targeted websites — which the hacker collective has been scanning for vulnerabilities since the beginning. “This is NOT the last time you hear of this operation,” Beemsee wrote. “We will be watching, and will act when the time is right.” Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/anonymous-war-donald-trump-fail-2016-4

Excerpt from:
The Anonymous ‘war’ on Donald Trump is a complete disaster

Bitcoin Startup Quits Operation Due to Never-Ending DDoS Attacks

Bitcoin’s Secure Wallet Service Coinkite Inc. Closing Down due to never-ending DDoS Attacks and Governmental Nagging Bitcoin exchanges around the world face cyber attacks every now and then, some owners give up while some fight back . In the case of Bitcoin startup Coinkite Inc., it is now officially announced that its secure wallet service, which started in 2012, will be closed within the next 30 days. It has also been made clear that customers must withdraw funds from their wallets by the end of this period. If any of the users fail to do so then their Bitcoin will be automatically credited to them. Prior to closing down all of the services, its TOR accessibility and application program interface of Coinkite will be closed for 14 days while their annual pre-paid plans’ prorated balances will continue to be refunded. The startup was under DDoS attacks for last three years The company now aims to focus upon hardware-oriented products such as the upcoming physical Bitcoin project Opendime. It will be a full-fledged standalone Bitcoin terminal or hardware wallet that will be equipped with a printer as well as QR scanner. Moreover, the company will be focusing upon hardware products for security optimization and authentication, all-purpose standalone Bitcoin solutions and services for hosting Bitcoin hot wallets. Since its inception, Coinkite was marketed as the most convenient and secure way to accept and exchange Bitcoin, the digital currency. The company claimed that it provided users the world’s “most advanced web wallet system.” It was considered a system that empowered customers and merchants to “BUY, SELL, ACCEPT and STORE Bitcoins and other cryptocurrencies, in both the online and physical worlds.” Why is Coinkite Closing the Secure Wallet Service NOW? The decision apparently is the outcome of the constant harassment that the online Bitcoin wallet service has been dealing with. In a blog post , it was revealed by the company that they had been receiving Distributed Denial of Service or DDoS attacks constantly over the past three years. They also have become tired of the attempts by governmental agencies for interrupting into their clients’ privacy. The CEO of the company Rodolfo Novak told CoinDesk that they wanted to shift their focus from software to hardware because their meager resources were being drained further by the “bullshit” that they have been experiencing. “We want to write software, not deal with lawyers and DDoSing…One of the main issues with SaaS is all the free users and need support and we want to provide good support. All these things have costs,” clarified Novak. Source: https://www.hackread.com/bitcoin-exchange-ddos-attacks/

View article:
Bitcoin Startup Quits Operation Due to Never-Ending DDoS Attacks

DNS root server attack was not aimed at root servers – infosec bods

Target appears to have been two Chinese domain names The internet’s root servers were not the target of a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack in December which for a short time took out four of the 13 pillars of the global network.…

More here:
DNS root server attack was not aimed at root servers – infosec bods

University of Georgia hit by DDoS Attack

The University of Georgia was the victim of a cyberattack Sunday night which blocked all Internet access for everyone on campus using the school’s network. The DDoS — distributed denial of service — attack came from outside UGA’s network, and began about 6:10 p.m., according to an email sent Monday by Timothy Chester, UGA’s vice president for information technology. A DDoS attack floods a target’s computer network with traffic, leaving the victim’s use of its websites and computer systems unavailable. During the incident, the university’s entire 20 gigabytes per second of Internet capacity was saturated with outside network traffic, which blocked access campus users.   UGA purchases its Internet connectivity through a nonprofit consortium, called Southern Crossroads, which is operated by Georgia Tech. School officials worked with Southern Crossroads to isolate the attack and began blocking it about 10 p.m., Chester’s message said. The attack ended shortly after that. As of Monday morning, officials had found no evidence that systems or data maintained by UGA had been compromised. Colleges and universities have increasingly been the target of these types of cyberattacks. Last year, Rutgers University students requested tuition refunds after the school experienced its fifth DDoS attack in a year. Arizona State University was also hit by a DDoS attack in April, blocking access to its Internet network a week before final exams. Some campuses are not currently equipped to identify DDoS attacks, and may not have a method for effectively mitigating them, industry experts say. “I personally regret that many of you experienced a disruption as you were preparing homework, getting ready for class or doing other University work and I offer my apologies,” Chester said to the campus community in the message. UGA plans to review the incident with federal, state and local law enforcement, and work with the University System of Georgia on reducing the risks of these types of attacks in the future.   Source: http://www.ajc.com/news/news/local-education/university-of-georgia-hit-by-cyberattack/nqtN9/

Read the original post:
University of Georgia hit by DDoS Attack

7 Iranians indicted for cyber attacks on US banks and a dam

The US Justice Department unsealed on Thursday an indictment charging seven Iranian computer specialists for conducting a coordinated campaign of distributed denial of service attacks against 46 major companies, primarily in the US financial sector, from late 2011 through mid-2013. The individuals – Ahmad Fathi; Hamid Firoozi; Amin Shokohi; Sadegh Ahmadzadegan, a/k/a Nitr0jen26; Omid Ghaffarinia, a/k/a PLuS; Sina Keissar; and Nader Saedi, a/k/a Turk Server – were employed by two Iran-based computer companies, ITSecTeam and … More ?

View article:
7 Iranians indicted for cyber attacks on US banks and a dam