Category Archives: DDoS Vendors

Docker servers infected with DDoS malware in extremely rare attacks

Up until recently, Docker servers misconfigured and left exposed online have been historically targeted with cryptocurrency-mining malware, which has helped criminal groups generate huge profits by hijacking someone else’s cloud resources. However, in a report published this week, security researchers from Trend Micro have discovered what appears to be the first organized and persistent series of attacks against Docker servers that infect misconfigured clusters with DDoS malware. According to Trend Micro, the two botnets are running versions of the XORDDoS and the Kaiji malware strains. Both malware operations have a long and well-documented history, especially XORDDoS, which has been spotted used in the wild for many years. However, the two DDoS botnets had usually targeted routers and smart devices, and never complex cloud setups, such as Docker clusters. “XORDDoS and Kaiji have been known to leverage telnet and SSH for spreading before, so I see Docker as a new vector which increases the potential of the botnet, a green field full of fresh fruit to pick with no immediate competitors,” Pascal Geenens, cybersecurity evangelist at Radwa r e , told ZDNet via email earlier this week. “Docker containers will typically provide more resources compared to IoT devices, but they typically run in a more secured environment, and it might be hard to impossible for the container to perform DDoS attacks,” Geenens added. “The unique perspective of IoT devices such as routers and IP cameras is that they have unrestricted access to the internet, but typically with less bandwidth and less horsepower compared to containers in a compromised environment,” the Radware researcher told ZDNet . “Containers, on the other hand, typically have access to way more resources in terms of memory, CPU, and network, but the network resources might be limited to only one or a few protocols, resulting in a smaller arsenal of DDoS attack vectors supported by those ‘super’ bots.” However, these limitations don’t usually impact crypto-mining botnets, which only need an open HTTPS channel to the outside world, Geenens said. But despite the limitations in how a DDoS gang could abuse hacked Docker clusters, Geenens says this won’t stop hackers from attacking this “green field full of fresh fruit to pick” as there are very few vulnerable IoT devices that haven’t been infected already, which has forced hackers to target Docker servers to begin with. And on a side note, Geenens also told ZDNet that he suspects that DDoS operators are already quite familiar with Docker systems already. While this is the first time they’re hacking Docker clusters, Geenens believes hackers often use Docker to manage their own attack infrastructure. “I have no immediate proof, but I’m pretty sure that in the same way as legitimate applications benefit from [Docker’s] automation and agility (DevOps), so will illegal applications.” The most common source of Docker hacks is the management interface (API) being left exposed online without authentication or being protected by a firewall. For readers looking to secure their servers, that would be a good first thing to check. In its report, Trend Micro also recommends that server administrators secure their Docker deployments by following a series of basic steps, detailed here . Source: https://www.zdnet.com/article/docker-servers-infected-with-ddos-malware-in-extremely-rare-attacks/

Originally posted here:
Docker servers infected with DDoS malware in extremely rare attacks

There are DDoS attacks, then there’s this 809 million packet-per-second tsunami Akamai says it just caught

Bank on the receiving end of massive 418Gbps traffic barrage Akamai reckons it blocked what may be the largest distributed denial-of-service attack ever, in terms of packets per second.…

View article:
There are DDoS attacks, then there’s this 809 million packet-per-second tsunami Akamai says it just caught

Week in review: DDoS attack trends, WannaCry lessons, new issue of (IN)SECURE

Here’s an overview of some of last week’s most interesting news and articles: Zero-day flaws in widespread TCP/IP library open millions of IoT devices to remote attack 19 vulnerabilities – some of them allowing remote code execution – have been discovered in a TCP/IP stack/library used in hundreds of millions of IoT and OT devices deployed by organizations in a wide variety of industries and sectors. Data Protection Officer independence: Ethical and practical considerations In … More ? The post Week in review: DDoS attack trends, WannaCry lessons, new issue of (IN)SECURE appeared first on Help Net Security .

Read More:
Week in review: DDoS attack trends, WannaCry lessons, new issue of (IN)SECURE

UPnP vulnerability lets attackers steal data, scan internal networks

A vulnerability (CVE-2020-12695) in Universal Plug and Play (UPnP), which is implemented in billions of networked and IoT devices – personal computers, printers, mobile devices, routers, gaming consoles, Wi-Fi access points, and so on – may allow unauthenticated, remote attackers to exfiltrate data, scan internal networks or make the devices participate in DDoS attacks. The post UPnP vulnerability lets attackers steal data, scan internal networks appeared first on Help Net Security .

Read the article:
UPnP vulnerability lets attackers steal data, scan internal networks

Kind of goes without saying, but fix your admin passwords or risk getting borged by this brute-forcing botnet

Publishing platforms, hosts being targeted by Stealthworker malware Servers are being targeted with a malware attack that uses its infected hosts to brute-force other machines.…

Continue Reading:
Kind of goes without saying, but fix your admin passwords or risk getting borged by this brute-forcing botnet

Kinda goes without saying, but shore up your admin passwords or be borged by this brute-forcing botnet

Publishing platforms, hosts being targeted by Stealthworker malware Servers are being targeted with a malware attack that uses its infected hosts to brute-force other machines.…

More here:
Kinda goes without saying, but shore up your admin passwords or be borged by this brute-forcing botnet

Huge Cyberattacks Attempt To Silence Black Rights Movement With DDoS Attacks

After the death of George Floyd and the subsequent protests across the U.S., cyberattacks on advocacy groups spiked by an astonishing 1,120 times. It’s unclear who is behind the attacks, but they included attempts to neuter anti-racist organizations’ freedom of speech. The data comes from Cloudflare, a Silicon Valley company that protects a vast number of websites from distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, where servers are flooded with traffic to make them inaccessible. As its tech is used by a number of advocacy groups—including Black Lives Matter—Cloudflare saw what was happening around the time of Floyd’s death, caused by a police officer—former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin—kneeling on Mr. Floyd’s neck till the life drained out of him. Fighting prejudice online And organizations whose purpose is to fight prejudice went from seeing almost no attacks on their sites to significant attempts to knock them offline. They included nearly 140 million likely malicious requests to load their websites. DDoS attacks see sites swamped with such requests, which mimic a massive number of people trying to get on a site at the same time, clogging up traffic to the page and making it inaccessible. “Those groups went from having almost no attacks at all in April to attacks peaking at 20,000 requests per second on a single site,” the company’s CEO, Matthew Prince, and its chief technology officer, John Graham-Cumming, wrote in a blog post. “One particular attacker, likely using a hacked server in France, was especially persistent and kept up an attack hitting an advocacy group continuously for over a day. We blocked those malicious HTTP requests and kept the site online.” In May, attacks on government, police and emergency services websites were up 1.8 times and 3.8 times on military websites, compared to the figures in April. Last week, the Minneapolis Police Department website was down after a reported DDoS attack. “We have been listening carefully to those who have taken to the streets in protest to demand justice and an end to structural racism, and believe that their powerful stories can serve as catalysts for real change. But that requires them to be heard,” the Cloudflare chiefs wrote in the post. “Unfortunately, if recent history is any guide, those who speak out against oppression will continue to face cyberattacks that attempt to silence them.” Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2020/06/03/huge-cyber-attacks-attempt-to-silence-black-rights-movement-with-ddos-attacks/#3460b946742b

Original post:
Huge Cyberattacks Attempt To Silence Black Rights Movement With DDoS Attacks

RangeAmp DDoS attacks can take down websites and CDN servers

A team of Chinese academics has found a new way to abuse HTTP packets to amplify web traffic and bring down websites and content delivery networks (CDNs). Named RangeAmp, this new Denial-of-Service (DoS) technique exploits incorrect implementations of the HTTP “Range Requests” attribute. HTTP Range Requests are part of the HTTP standard and allow clients (usually browsers) to request only a specific portion (range) of a file from a server. The feature was created for pausing and resuming traffic in controlled (pause/resume actions) or uncontrolled (network congestion or disconnections) situations. The HTTP Range Requests standard has been under discussion at the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) for more than half a decade, but, due to its usefulness, has already been implemented by browsers, servers, and CDNs. Two RangeAmp attacks discovered Now, a team of Chinese academics says that attackers can use malformed HTTP Range Requests to amplify how web servers and CDN systems react when having to deal with a range request operation. The team says two different RangeAmp attacks exist. The first is called a RangeAmp Small Byte Range (SBR) attack. In this case [see (a) in the image below], the attacker sends a malformed HTTP range request to the CDN provider, which amplifies the traffic towards the destination server, eventually crashing the targeted site. The second is called a RangeAmp Overlapping Byte Ranges (OBR) attack. In this case [see b) in the image below], the attacker sends a malformed HTTP range request to a CDN provider, and in the case, the traffic is funneled through other CDN servers, the traffic is amplified inside the CDN networks, crashing CDN servers and rendering both the CDNs and many other destination sites inaccessible. Image: Weizhong et al. Academics said they tested RangeAmp attacks against 13 CDN providers and found that all were vulnerable to the RangeAmp SBR attack, and six were also vulnerable to the OBR variant when used in certain combinations. Researchers said the attacks were very dangerous and required a minimum of resources to carry out. Of the two, RangeAmp SBR attacks could amplify traffic the most. The research team found that attackers could use a RangeAmp SBR attack to inflate traffic from 724 to 43,330 times the original traffic. Image: Weizhong et al. RangeAmp OBR attacks were a little harder to carry out, as the six vulnerable CDNs needed to be in specific (master-surrogate) configurations, but when conditions were met, reserchers said OBR attacks could also be used to inflate traffic inside a CDN network with amplification factors of up to nearly 7,500 times the initial packet size. Image: Weizhong et al. Of the two, OBR attacks were considered more dangerous, as attackers could take down entire chunks of a CDN provider’s network, bringing down connectivity for thousands of websites at a time. CDN vendors notified seven months ago Academics said that for the past few months they have been silently contacting the affected CDN providers and disclosing the details of the RangeAmp attack. Of the 13 CDN providers, researchers said that 12 responded positively and either rolled out or said they planned to roll out updates to their HTTP Range Request implementation. The list includes Akamai, Alibaba Cloud, Azure, Cloudflare, CloudFront, CDNsun, CDN77, Fastly, G-Core Labs, Huawei Cloud, KeyCDN, and Tencent Cloud. “Unfortunately, although we have sent them emails several times and have tried to reach out to their customer services, StackPath did not provide any feedback,” the research team said. “In general, we have tried our best to responsibly report the vulnerabilities and provide mitigation solutions. The related CDN vendors have had nearly seven months to implement mitigation techniques before this paper was published.” Each CDN provider’s reply, along with technical details about the RangeAmp attacks, are available in the research team’s paper, entitled “CDN Backfired: Amplification Attacks Based on HTTP Range Requests,” available for download in PDF format from here. Source: https://www.zdnet.com/article/rangeamp-attacks-can-take-down-websites-and-cdn-servers/

See original article:
RangeAmp DDoS attacks can take down websites and CDN servers

Oh cool, tech service prices are plummeting. And by tech services, we mean botnet rentals and stolen credit cards

Supply and demand in action Crime has never been cheaper to pull off, so long as you’re not particular about quality.…

Excerpt from:
Oh cool, tech service prices are plummeting. And by tech services, we mean botnet rentals and stolen credit cards

NXNSAttack technique can be abused for large-scale DDoS attacks

New vulnerability in DNS server software can be leveraged for DDoS attacks with an 1620x amplification factor. A team of academics from Israel has disclosed today details about NXNSAttack, a vulnerability in DNS servers that can be abused to launch DDoS attacks of massive proportions. According to the research team, NXNSAttack impacts recursive DNS servers and the process of DNS delegation. Recursive DNS servers are DNS systems that pass DNS queries upstream in order to be resolved and converted from a domain name into an IP address. These conversions take place on authoritative DNS servers, the servers that contain a copy of the DNS record, and are authorized to resolve it. However, as a safety mechanism part of the DNS protocol, authoritative DNS servers can also “delegate” this operation to alternative DNS servers of their choosing. New NXNSAttack explained In a research paper published today, academics from the Tel Aviv University and The Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya, Israel, said they found a way to abuse this delegation process for DDoS attacks. The NXNSAttack technique has different facets and variations, but the basic steps are detailed below: 1) An attacker sends a DNS query to a recursive DNS server. The request is for a domain like “attacker.com,” which is managed through an attacker-controlled authoritative DNS server. 2) Since the recursive DNS server is not authorized to resolve this domain, it forwards the operation to the attacker’s malicious authoritative DNS server. 3) The malicious DNS server replies to the recursive DNS server with a message that equates to “I’m delegating this DNS resolving operation to this large list of name servers.” The list contains thousands of subdomains for a victim website. 4) The recursive DNS server forwards the DNS query to all the subdomains on the list, creating a surge in traffic for the victim’s authoritative DNS server. Image: NIC.CZ NXNSAttack has a huge amplification factor The research team says that an attacker using NXNSAttack can amplify a simple DNS query from 2 to 1,620 times its initial size, creating a massive spike in traffic that can crash a victim’s DNS server. Once the DNS server goes down, this also prevents users from accessing the attacked website, as the site’s domain can’t be resolved anymore. The research team says the NXNSAttack packet amplification factor (PAF) depends on the DNS software running on a recursive DNS server; however, in most cases, the amplification factor is many times larger than other DDoS amplification (reflection) attacks, where the PAF is usually between lowly values of 2 and 10. This large PAF implies that NXNSAttack is one of the most dangerous DDoS attack vectors known to date, having the ability to launch debilitating attacks with only a few devices and automated DNS queries. Patches available for DNS software The Israeli researchers said they’ve been working for the past few months with the makers of DNS software, content delivery networks, and managed DNS providers to apply mitigations to DNS servers across the world. Impacted software includes the likes of ISC BIND (CVE-2020-8616), NLnet labs Unbound (CVE-2020-12662), PowerDNS (CVE-2020-10995), and CZ.NIC Knot Resolver (CVE-2020-12667), but also commercial DNS services provided by companies like Cloudflare, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Oracle (DYN), Verisign, IBM Quad9, and ICANN. Image: Shafir et al. Patches have been released today and over the previous weeks. They include mitigations that prevent attackers from abusing the DNS delegation process to flood other DNS servers. Server administrators who run their own DNS servers are advised to update DNS resolver software to the latest version. The research team’s work has been detailed in an academic paper entitled “ NXNSAttack: Recursive DNS Inefficiencies and Vulnerabilities ,” available for download in PDF format . Source: https://www.zdnet.com/article/nxnsattack-technique-can-be-abused-for-large-scale-ddos-attacks/

View the original here:
NXNSAttack technique can be abused for large-scale DDoS attacks