DDoS cyber attacks get bigger, smarter, more damaging

Crashing websites and overwhelming data centers, a new generation of cyber attacks is costing millions and straining the structure of the Internet. While some attackers are diehard activists, criminal gangs or nation states looking for a covert way to hit enemies, others are just teenage hackers looking for kicks. Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks have always been among the most common on the Internet, using hijacked and virus-infected computers to target websites until they can no longer cope with the scale of data requested, but recent weeks have seen a string of particularly serious attacks. On February 10, internet security firm Cloudflare says it protected one of its customers from what might be the largest DDoS documented so far. At its height, the near 400 gigabyte per second (gbps) assault was about 30 percent larger than the largest attack documented in 2013, an attempt to knock down antispam website Spamhaus, which is also protected by Cloudflare. The following day, a DDoS attack on virtual currency Bitcoin briefly took down its ability to process payments. [ID:nL2N0LG1Y8] On February 20, Internet registration firm Namecheap said it was temporarily overwhelmed by a simultaneous attack on 300 of the websites it registers, and bit.ly, which creates shortened addresses for websites like Twitter, says it was also knocked out briefly in February. In a dramatic case of extortion, social networking site Meetup.com said on Monday it was fighting a sustained battle against hackers who brought down the site for several days and were demanding $300 to stop. It would not pay, Meetup CEO Scott Heiferman told Reuters. DDoS attacks were at the heart of attacks blamed on Russian hackers against Estonia in 2007 and Georgia during its brief war with Russia in 2008. It is unclear if they played a role in the current stand-off between Moscow and Ukraine in which communications were disrupted and at least one major government website knocked out for up to 72 hours. A report this month by security firm Prolexic said attacks were up 32 percent in 2013, and a December study by the cyber-security-focused Ponemon Institute showed them now responsible for 18 percent of outages at U.S.-based data centers from just 2 percent in 2010. The average cost of a single outage was $630,000, it said. “It’s really a game of cat and mouse,” said Jag Bains, chief technology officer of Seattle-based DOSarrest, a firm that helps government and private-sector clients protect their sites. “I’d like to say we are ahead, but I just don’t think it’s true.” As well as growing in volume, he said attacks were becoming much more sophisticated in targeting the most vulnerable parts of websites, making even a small attack much more effective. The aims of attackers include extortion, political activism, providing distraction from data theft and, for “hobbyist” hackers, just testing and showcasing their skills, security experts say. Other victims in recent months have included the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Royal Bank of Scotland and several major U.S. banks, which analysts believe were targeted by Iran in response to sanctions. Iran denies the charge. HIJACKING PRINTERS, SMARTPHONES Many attacks, however, appear to be homegrown. The most popular point of origin for DDoS attacks in the last three months of 2013, Prolexic said, appeared to be the United States, followed by China, Thailand, Britain and South Korea. As well as hijacking computers, Prolexic said attackers are increasingly targeting smartphones, particularly those using Google’s Android operating system, which by the third quarter of 2013 accounted for more than 80 percent of new phones. Even wireless printers, experts say, have sometimes been co-opted into attacks, packed together in botnet groups. That, they warn, can put previously unprecedented cyber firepower in the hands of relatively unskilled hackers, who increasingly include teenagers. Last year, British police arrested a 16-year-old as part of their investigations into the attack on Spamhaus, while German police arrested an 18-year-old after a DDoS attack paralyzed the Saxony government website. DDoSarrest says some of the most recent attacks it has dealt with were on U.S. universities and largely blamed on students showing off or protesting against high tuition fees. The sheer volume of attacks means many perpetrators are never traced, and some computer security experts complain law-enforcement authorities remain reluctant to prosecute the youngest offenders. Until recently, DDoS attacks were seen less of a threat than attempts to steal customer data or intellectual property. That, however, is changing fast. SLOWING THE INTERNET Last year’s Spamhaus attack was described by some as slowing the entire global Internet, and most experts agree the largest attacks can slow access across entire regions. Cloudflare says there were anecdotal reports of slowness in Europe during the latest attack. Crashing data centers can wreak havoc with other services based there, including phone systems and vital industrial facilities. The Ponemon report showed DDoS attacks are now the third largest cause of outages after power system failure and human error, outstripping traditional causes such as weather events. Even if attacks do not succeed, the cost of mitigating them is rising fast, providing many millions of dollars of business for firms such as Cloudflare and Prolexic, taken over last month by Akamai Technologies for about $370 million. Namecheap, which aims to offer cut-price hosting for websites, said it had already spread its data centers across five countries and three continents to better handle constant attacks but was still overwhelmed by the roughly 100 Gbps incident. Attacks on that scale, Prolexic says, now occur several times a month and are now frequently so complex and fast moving that automated systems can no longer tackle them. Prolexic itself runs a permanently manned operation centre at its headquarters in Florida, allowing it to keep one step ahead and instantly move material between data centers. “It’s very hard to know what to do,” said Alexander Klimburg, a cyber security expert at the Austrian Institute for International Affairs currently on exchange at Harvard Kennedy School of Government. “The tools to do this can be purchased online incredibly cheaply, while the damage they can do and the cost of mitigating it is exponentially higher.” Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/05/us-cyber-ddos-idUSBREA240XZ20140305

Visit link:
DDoS cyber attacks get bigger, smarter, more damaging

Why is Meetup Site Down? Hacker Attempts to Extort $300 From CEO Scott Heiferman

The Meetup site is down after a hacker attempted to extort $300 from the site’s CEO Scott Heiferman. The social networking site was the victim of a DDoS attack that was allegedly paid for by one of Meetup’s competitors. The attack began on Thursday when CEO Scott Heiferman received an email that reads: Date: Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:26 AM Subject: DDoS attack, warning A competitor asked me to perform a DDoS attack on your website. I can stop the attack for $300 USD. Let me know if you are interested in my offer. As soon as Heiferman received the email, the attack began and overwhelmed Meetup’s servers. The site went down and stayed that way for nearly 24 hours. The success of the site being back up was short-lived as Meetup was hit again and again with numerous DDoS attacks over the course of the weekend. Why is Meetup Site Down? Hacker Attempts to Extort $300 From CEO Scott Heiferman – photo from Twitter Stating his reasons for not paying the hacker behind the attack, Heiferman wrote on Meetup’s blog: We chose not to pay because: 1. We made a decision not to negotiate with criminals. 2. The extortion dollar amount suggests this to be the work of amateurs, but the attack is sophisticated. We believe this lowball amount is a trick to see if we are the kind of target who would pay.  We believe if we pay, the criminals would simply demand much more. 3. Payment could make us (and all well-meaning organizations like us) a target for further extortion demands as word spreads in the criminal world. 4. We are confident we can protect Meetup from this aggressive attack, even if it will take time. As of right now, the site is still down as the Meetup team continues to secure its servers. When users attempt to log onto the site, they are met with the following error message: Over the past several days, Meetup has suffered a prolonged denial of service (DDoS) attack, resulting in intermittent service outages for our website and apps. We’re working urgently to bring Meetup back and restore full functionality. We appreciate your patience. Heiferman encourages all Meetup users to stay informed by receiving updates via Twitter, Facebook or the company’s blog. Why is Meetup Site Down? Hacker Attempts to Extort $300 From CEO Scott Heiferman. Source: http://americanlivewire.com/2014-03-03-meetup-site-down/

Taken from:
Why is Meetup Site Down? Hacker Attempts to Extort $300 From CEO Scott Heiferman

Miscreant menaces Meetup, minuscule money mania mashed

$300 or the trendy website gets it … and the website got it Meetup.com has gone public with one of the most paltry ransom demands The Register has seen – but rather than pay up to end a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack, the klatch organizer instead put up with its site being repeatedly hosed offline, we’re told.…

Read the original:
Miscreant menaces Meetup, minuscule money mania mashed

DDoS Attack! Is Regulation The Answer?

Four security experts weigh in on why there’s been little progress in combating DDoS attacks and how companies can start fighting back. The scale, diversity, and magnitude of recent DDoS attacks have knocked enterprises back on their heels. Now they’re attracting attention from regulators. Intended or not, attackers are forcing a sea change. The question at hand is whether self-regulation will improve or if regulatory intervention is inevitable. Cloudflare’s recent analysis of a February 13 denial of service attack explains the most recent variation on a recurring DDoS attack theme, and in doing so illustrates that we’ve made little or no progress in mitigating root causes of DDoS: The attack was distributed , emanating from over four thousand servers and twelve hundred networks. The attack used reflection , a technique where the source IP address of query traffic is “spoofed.” All of the attacking hosts set the source IP address of queries to the IP address of the targeted host so that the responses will overwhelm the victim. The attack also used amplification , a technique where a small query results in a much larger response being transmitted in order to deplete the target’s resources more rapidly. There are also other similarities between this and prior DDoS attacks. The attacks exploit UDP-based services (DNS, chargen, and now NTP). They exploit the absence of anti-spoofing measures by ISPs or private networks, and they exploit the “open” operation of these services, taking advantage of open DNS resolvers, publicly accessible network time servers, and services that should be configured to respond only to clients within specific administrative domains. The takeaway is obvious: Services that run over UDP and are accessible in a public or open manner are targets for reflection or amplification attacks, and the ability to spoof IP addresses exacerbates this threat .    

Original post:
DDoS Attack! Is Regulation The Answer?

Crap hospital databases next goldmine for cyber-crooks, say Microsoft’s botnet slayers

Your medical files are worth big bucks to fraudsters RSA 2014   The low levels of security in healthcare IT systems, and the high value of its data, is going to make the sector the next big target for scammers, according to the Microsoft-backed team that takes down botnets.…

Read this article:
Crap hospital databases next goldmine for cyber-crooks, say Microsoft’s botnet slayers

The rise of UDP-based DDoS attacks

The DDoS war is ramping up with the use of network time protocol (NTP) amplification to paralyse, not just individual organisation’s networks, but potentially large proportions of general internet traffic. The largest ever DDoS attack to date with a DNS amplification hit the anti-spam company, Spamhaus last year. This attack reached 300 Gbps, taking Spamhaus offline and also affecting the DDoS mitigation firm, CloudFare. With the volume of traffic that was going through peering exchanges and transit providers, the attack also slowed down internet traffic for everyone else. However, in the last couple of months these UDP amplification attacks seem to have moved on to NTP, taking advantage of an exploit available in older, unpatched NTP systems. These servers are usually used for time synchronisation and utilise the UDP protocol on port 123. Like DNS, they will respond to commands issued by any client to query certain information, unless they are properly secured. These attack styles are not new, but their historically infrequent usage and the potential for mass disruption means they warrant more attention. Coverage of these attack styles in both industry and mainstream press is to be welcomed in my opinion, because these attacks are relatively defensible and coverage will hopefully get more administrators to secure or patch their NTP servers. What is all the fuss about? DNS amplification attacks ramp up the power of a botnet when targeting a victim. The basic technique of a DNS amplification attack is to spoof the IP address of the intended target and send a request for large DNS zone files to any number of open recursive DNS servers. The DNS server then responds to the request, sending the large DNS zone answer to the attack target rather than the attacker, because the source IP was spoofed. The DNS amplification attack on Spamhaus saw request data (the data the attacker sent to the DNS servers) of roughly 36 bytes in length, while the response data (the data from the DNS server to the attack target) was around 3000 bytes, meaning the attackers increased the bandwidth used by 100x. Not only is that a large increase in attack bandwidth, but these packets from the DNS servers arrive at the target in a fragmented state due to their large size and have to be reassembled, which ties up the routing resources as well. NTP amplification attacks work by spoofing the IP of the attack target and sending a ’monlist’ command request to the NTP servers. This command will return the IP addresses of the last 600 clients that have used the NTP server to synchronise time. By issuing this command a small request packet can trigger much larger UDP response packets containing active IP addresses and other data. The volume of the response data is related to the number of clients that communicate with any particular NTP server. This means that a single request which consists of a single 64-byte UDP packet can be increased to 100 responses each, which contain the last 600 client IP addresses that have synchronised with the server. Each of those 100 responses will be a UDP packet of around 482 bytes which gives the attacker a bandwidth amplification of around 700x [482 bytes x 100 responses = 48200 bytes / 64 bytes = 753.125]. With this level of amplification available and several popular DDoS attack tools already including a module for abusing ’monlist’ we could be on for a new record in DDoS attack size this year unless the vulnerabilities are patched soon. For example, if DNS amplification created a 300 Gbps, then NTP amplification means we could potentially see a 2.1 Tbps (21,000 Gbps) attack. There is no network that could absorb an attack of that size; it would have an enormous knock-on effect on general Internet traffic as the Spamhaus attack did with peering points, transit providers and content delivery networks being overloaded. This isn’t to say that DNS and NTP are the only amplification attack methods. There are other amplification and reflection-style tactics as well and, while not as popular as more tried-and-true DDoS methods, they represent a real threat if you are not prepared for them. Fixing the problem The easiest way to fix this and remove your NTP servers from being an attack vector for a DDoS is to update your NTP servers to version 4.2.7 which removes the ‘monlist’ command. Otherwise you can disable query within your NTP server via a configuration change: nano /etc/ntp.conf [Your configuration file might be located elsewhere] #Restrict general access to this device Restrict default ignore Restrict xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx mask 255.255.255.255 nomodify notrap Noquery This change will prevent your NTP server from being used to launch DDoS attacks against other networks, but an update to the latest version is still recommended. Conclusion DDoS attacks have been around in one form or another since the very beginnings of the internet, but the motivations, as well as the scale of these attacks seem to have grown significantly. In the early days it was just extortion; a hacker would ask for payment to stop the attacks. Nowadays, some businesses may pay for competitors to be attacked, as a few hours offline could be worth millions. You also have DDoS being used as a method of political activism by groups such as Anonymous, as well as the potential for a government to use DDoS to disrupt another country’s infrastructure. Systems administrators need to ensure their systems are reviewed regularly for patches and known vulnerabilities. If systems are left unpatched then at best you can be used as a vector to attack another network or organisation, but at worst those vulnerabilities could be exploited to take your systems offline or steal your data. Source: http://blogs.techworld.com/industry-insight/2014/02/the-rise-of-udp-based-ddos-attacks/index.htm

Read more here:
The rise of UDP-based DDoS attacks

Cyber attacks ready to lay siege to 2014 World Cup

Brazilian hackers have issued threats to disrupt this summer’s FIFA World Cup and there are worries that the telecommunications infrastructure won’t be able to cope with the attacks. Reuters spoke to hacking groups headquartered in Brazil that are planning to attack the event due to the global exposure it will give them and they are confident of bringing down some of the largest sites involved with the tournament. “We are already making plans,” said an alleged hacker who goes by the name Eduarda Dioratto. “I don’t think there is much they can do to stop us.” Distributed denial of service [DDoS] attacks are reportedly the weapon of choice for Brazil’s hackers to target sites operated by FIFA and the Brazilian government as well as other sponsors and organisers.   “The attacks will be directed against official websites and those of companies sponsoring the Cup,” a hacker known as Che Commodore told Reuters over Skype.Some of the problems that could be exploited include overstrained networks, widespread use of pirated programming and little care taken to invest in online security. The same report also states that one of the “world’s most sophisticated cyber criminal communities” already operates in the country and it has already started to scupper ticket sales through phishing. “It’s not a question of whether the Cup will be targeted, but when,” said William Beer, a cybersecurity expert with the consultancy firm Alvarez & Marsal. “So resilience and response become extremely important.” FIFA has yet to comment on the issue and the country itself is confident that it is at least some way prepared for any attacks that are launched. “It would be reckless for any nation to say it’s 100 percent prepared for a threat,” said General José Carlos dos Santos, the head of the cyber command for Brazil’s army. “But Brazil is prepared to respond to the most likely cyber threats.” During the Confederations Cup 2013, the traditional dress rehearsal for the World Cup, the cyber command stopped over 300 cyber attacks and dos Santos added that the number will be “much higher” during the tournament proper. Source: http://www.itproportal.com/2014/02/26/cyber-attacks-ready-to-lay-siege-to-2014-world-cup/#ixzz2uZ9neK9Q

Read More:
Cyber attacks ready to lay siege to 2014 World Cup

Bitly faces complete shutdown of services due to DDoS attack

Online URL shortening services provided by Bitly are down due to a DDoS attack and engineers were trying to solve the issues at the time of publishing Online URL shortening service provided by Bitly was under a major DDoS (distributed denial-of-service attack) on Wednesday. The website states the problem on a banner on their site and a tweet was put out by the company that its services would be restored eventually. Bitly’s internal team of engineers are working on fixing the problem. We are currently working to mitigate a DDoS attack. Some of our site may be unavailable, but we’re working to restore full functionality. — Bitly (@Bitly) February 26, 2014 Services to the links was resumed a little later, however damage from the attack was still being worked on at the time of publishing this article. Bitly, informs on their website, “All links are working after mitigating an earlier DDOS attack. Some link metrics may still be delayed.” Update: All links are working after mitigating an earlier DDOS attack. Some link metrics may still be delayed. — Bitly (@Bitly) February 26, 2014   What is DDoS attack?  – Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack is an attempt to make a machine or network resource unavailable to its intended users. – Although the means to carry out, motives for, and targets of a DoS attack may vary, it generally consists of efforts to temporarily or indefinitely interrupt or suspend services of a host connected to the Internet. – As clarification, DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attacks are sent by two or more persons, or bots. – DoS (Denial of Service) attacks are sent by one person or system.   The company Bitly, Inc. was established in 2008 and is privately held and based in New York City. Bitly shortens more than one billion links per month, for use in social networking, SMS, and email services and is relied for accuracy and reliability. No doubt, this caused some what of a furor online with people even going so far as to refer to this attack as the ‘death of the internet’. #bitly is down. The internet is dying — iwyg (@_iwyg_) February 26, 2014 Why are so many #Bitly links failing to open today?? What’s up @hootsuite ?? — Slaweezy (@Slaweezy) February 26, 2014 On no #bitly is down and I haven’t had my fix of web based stats yet for the day #marketingbreakdown — Steve Scheja-Terry (@Von_Steve) February 26, 2014 The web is collapsing! #bitly is down! — Ben R. Hodges (@BenHodgesH2O) February 26, 2014

View article:
Bitly faces complete shutdown of services due to DDoS attack

Theresa May Home Office website DDoS attack: Man charged

A man is being charged with attacking websites belonging to the Home Office and the Home Secretary Theresa May. Mark Lynden Johnson, 43, from Stoke-on-Trent, is being charged with encouraging or assisting an offence under the Computer Misuse Act. He is due to appear at Birmingham Magistrates’ Court on 12 March. Both websites were taken offline during attacks between 15 and 18 June 2012, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said. The websites were subjected to a Distributed Denial Of Service attack, also known as a DDoS attack, which prevented visitors accessing them, a CPS spokesperson said. A DDoS attack floods a webserver with so many requests that it can no longer respond to legitimate users. Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-stoke-staffordshire-26341874

Continue reading here:
Theresa May Home Office website DDoS attack: Man charged