Did dads storm site on Father’s Day? Some seem to think so The genealogy site Ancestry.com has been blasted off the internet after reportedly being hit by a DDoS attack.…
Read More:
YOU’RE HISTORY: Ancestry.com goes titsup for TWO DAYS
Did dads storm site on Father’s Day? Some seem to think so The genealogy site Ancestry.com has been blasted off the internet after reportedly being hit by a DDoS attack.…
Read More:
YOU’RE HISTORY: Ancestry.com goes titsup for TWO DAYS
Pandemiya is 25,000 lines of original password-pinching botnet badassery An RSA researcher claims to have found an entirely new trojan during his trawls of the criminal underground.…
Follow this link:
Entirely new trojan quietly wheeled into black hat forums
Update 7.26am PST (June 12) After initially giving the all-clear for business to resume, Feedly has announced that it’s currently suffering a second round of DDoS attacks. The company says in a blog post: “We are currently being targeted by a second DDoS attack and are working with our service providers to mitigate the issue. As with yesterday’s attack, your data is safe. We apologize for the inconvenience and will update this blog post as more information is available or the situation changes.” Update 3:40PM PT: Feedly has posted on its blog that it has neutralized the DDoS attack as of 3:07PM PT. “You should now be able to access your feedly from both feedly.com, mobile apps and third party applications. Our ops team is closely monitoring the situation in case the attacks resume. It might take a few hours for some of the 40 million feeds we poll to be fully updated. We would like to re-iterate that none of your data was compromised by this attack.” Original post below: If you’ve been having issues accessing your RSS feed via Feedly today, well, there’s a good reason for that. Feedly has announced that it’s currently suffering a DDoS (distributed denial-of-service) attack, with the perpetrator(s) attempting to garner money from the company to make it stop. “We refused to give in and are working with our network providers to mitigate the attack as best as we can,” explains Edwin Khodabakchian, founder and CEO of Feedly. Feedly is assuring its users that their data remains safe, and access will be restored once the “attack is mitigated.” Other companies have been affected by a DDoS too, as Feedly alludes to when it says “we are working in parallel with other victims of the same group and with law enforcement.” Just yesterday, Evernote reported it had been subjected to a similar attack, though it was quickly restored. It’s not clear whether this is directly related to the current attack on Feedly. We’ll update here when we receive any updates. Source: http://thenextweb.com/insider/2014/06/11/feedly-suffers-ddos-attack-perpetrator-tries-extort-money/
More here:
Feedly suffers second round of DDoS attacks after perpetrator tried to extort money
The popular online notes and web clippings saving service Evernote has suffered disruption after coming under cyberattack. The firm said it was hit by a distributed denial of service attack that began on Tuesday. Some members were temporarily unable to synchronise their filings from one device to another while it continued. The California-based company announced last month that it had more than 100 million users. Distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks are caused by what can be thousands of computers sending huge amounts of data to a target’s servers in an effort to overwhelm them. This sometimes involves hijacked PCs – whose owners may be unaware of their involvement – in what is known as a botnet. This is not the first time the storage service has been compromised. In 2013 it said hackers had managed to access user names, email addresses and encrypted passwords. However, it appears that the latest cyber-assault is more limited. Spokeswoman Ronda Scott told the BBC that the cyber-assault, caused by an unknown perpetrator, began at 14:25 local time [22:25 BST] on Tuesday and had not yet ended. “We continue to mitigate the effects of the attack, but have successfully returned Evernote to service,” she added. “As is the nature of DDoS attacks, there was no data loss, and no accounts were compromised.” Source: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27790068
Streaming music service Deezer experienced several hours of downtime this weekend just gone, thanks, apparently, to one of those Distributed Denial Of Service attacks that were so fashionable a few years back. The source of the DDoS isn’t clear, but the streaming service says its servers were first targeted on Friday, with no real impact, but that a high level attack occurred on Saturday afternoon, taking the service offline on all platforms. DDoS attacks swamp a server with traffic so that it crashes under the weight. Deezer bosses say that while the DDoS was enough to force their service offline, no data was accessed by the attackers. The company’s IT experts identified the course of the problem and put in place measures to limit the impact of the DDoS, so that even though the server attack continued through Sunday, the service has been back online since just after midnight Saturday night. Deezer Founder Daniel Marhely said yesterday in a message to users: “As soon as we became aware of the issue we launched an investigation. We assigned ten staff members to the incident and worked to get the service back up, fuelled by a winning mix of adrenalin and pizza. The method of attack was quickly identified and actions were taken to minimise the impact on the service. We regularly adapted solutions to the changing methods of attack. New protective measures (filters to distinguish between normal incoming traffic and flooding traffic from the attack) were set up by our team, and the attacks finally stopped around 00.22 GMT”. Stressing that no user data had leaked during the attack, the Deezer man went on: “We apologise for any inconvenience. We’re continuing to investigate and are working hard on measures to counter this type of attack in the future. We have taken steps to strengthen our servers and security systems and will continue to do so. Thanks for your patience. We really appreciated your kind messages and encouraging tweets throughout the weekend”. Source: http://www.completemusicupdate.com/article/ddos-attack-takes-deezer-offline/
Original post:
DDoS attack takes Deezer offline
The “National Strategic Assessment of Serious and Organised Crime 2014”, published in May by the UK National Crime Agency, listed DDoS as a major concern for business critical systems for the first ti…
See the article here:
Winning the war on web stealth attacks
Distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks attempt to flood a server with so many requests that they render a website useless. The effects are many, from lost customer conversions and revenue to punished SEO ranking and blacklisting. The reality is that DDoS attack methods and the criminals behind them are evolving. Understanding this evolution is key to making sure companies that place any sort of importance on their websites stay protected. The type and style of attack is changing – there are headless browsers and application layer attacks, and DDoS attacks as cover for more sinister cyberattacks. Every reseller with security in the portfolio needs to understand that DDoS is not a static problem that can be dealt with and then ignored. It changes, and the tactics for defending against this type of attack need to advance even faster. Better general awareness about DDoS attacks has forced attackers to develop new ways to get around the basic defences. Media attention on high-profile DDoS attacks attracts activists with a message. Groups try to outdo one another in a bid for attention. A growing variety of coding practices, web platforms and web design features have multiplied the number of variables which can result in application exploits, rendering a website useless. With more access to high-CPU devices available through the cloud and dedicated hosting, DDoS attackers can now use those CPUs to run more sophisticated attacks. For these reasons, we are seeing more sophistication in attack style, meaning there is less volume and attackers are targeting very specific vulnerabilities in a website by doing their homework to make sure they target the weakest points. One of the stealthiest methods is headless browsers. These can be a clever way for cybercriminals to get around standard DDoS protection and masquerade as legitimate web traffic. The kit itself is used for programmers to test their websites, so to all intents and purposes, it is a legitimate browser web kit, just modified to run a series of queries and target basic web user interfaces. Detection is difficult and stopping a headless browser DDoS attack can take a trained professional to spot and remediate it. Importantly, with headless browsers Javascript and Captcha can be processed and can jump through the hoops, as it were, of the website, as it was designed for testing. This will be a big problem for more traditional DDoS protection, such as box solutions. What will be most effective here is real-time support, where there is a human involved who can develop some rule sets to determine what is going on and implement the modules within seconds. Application layer attacks are also becoming more prevalent, although you might not even notice them, if you don’t know what you are looking for. Attackers are getting better at reconnaissance and research, facilitating smarter attacks that can keep the volume low and under the radar, meanwhile killing the site in the background and fooling IT into spending time on the wrong part of the site when it is down. It is these application attacks and headless browser attacks that we see as the biggest concern for the future. I can only surmise that media hype is fuelling the focus on volumetric DDoS attacks, which is where the industry seems to be concentrating to meet customer expectations. Actually there is a rise in application attacks and we should be educating companies about these threats, as they indicate serious consequences for businesses that place any sort of importance on their websites. Jag Bains is chief technology officer of DOSarrest Source: http://www.channelweb.co.uk/crn-uk/opinion/2348218/facing-a-criminal-denial-of-service
See the original post:
Facing a criminal DDoS attack
Zeus is a well-known and highly successful crimeware kit – the flat-pack furniture of the virus world. It is under constant development by several criminals or groups and new functionalities are const…
View article:
Why botnet takedowns can cause more harm than good
WildStar was set to launch for early buyers an hour ago, giving those folks a chance to jump into the game’s world days before everyone else. Unfortunately for those players (including our own Giant Robots In Disguise guild), WildStar is experiencing server issues and the developers are pointing the finger at a DDoS attack. WildStar executive producer Jeremy Gaffney posted on Reddit, “I’ve heard from a few folks it’s a confirmed DDOS attack (real time updates, may change, fog of war, etc.). Partially handled. Servers taking in some players now, player counts rising. Ninjitsu continues.” The best suggestion for now is to keep hammering away. The early bird period lasts all the way up to WildStar’s official release on June 3. Source: http://www.shacknews.com/article/84738/wildstar-early-access-period-derailed-by-ddos-attacks
Read the article:
WildStar early access period derailed by DDoS attacks
Empirical research just published suggests that, whilst overall DDoS attack volumes are increasing steadily, new attack vectors are also constantly being used by cybercriminals. The analysis – entitled `NSFOCUS DDoS Threat Report 2013? – is based on more than 244,000 real-life distributed denial of service attacks observed at Tier 1 or Tier 2 ISPs by the research firm during the year. Researchers found that 79.8 percent of all attacks were 50 Mbps or less. In addition, although large size attacks get the most media attention, only 0.63 percent of all attack incidents were logged at 4 Gbps or more. Perhaps most interestingly of all is that more than 90 percent of the observed attacks lasted 30 minutes or less – and that 63.6 per cent of all targeted victims are attacked more than once. This figure is in line with earlier figures from Neustar whose second annual report, entitled `DDoS Attacks & Impact Report – 2014: The Danger Deepens’ – suggested that once attacked, there is an estimated 69 percent chance of a repeat attack. Delving into the report reveals that HTTP_FLOOD, TCP_FLOOD and DNS_FLOOD are the top three attack types – contributing to more than 87 percent of all attacks. DNS_FLOOD attacks, however, significantly increased from 13.1 percent during the first half of the 2013 to 50.1 percent in the second half. So why the short duration attacks? The report suggests that, after analysing almost a quarter million DDoS incidents, a clear trend emerges, namely that that majority of DDoS attacks seen were short in duration, small in total attack size, and frequently repeating against the same target. “These short and frequently repeating attacks often serve two purposes: First, to scout their victims’ defence capabilities before more tailored assaults are launched, and second, to act as smokescreens or decoys for other exploitation,” says the report. The analysis adds that that many companies are using a combination of traditional counter-measures like scripts, tools and access control lists (ACLs) to handle network layer attacks – as well as on-premise DDoS mitigation systems for more prompt and effective mitigation against hybrid attacks (defined as a combination of network-layer and application-layer attacks). The most interesting takeout from the report, SCMagazineUK.com notes, is that the `old guard’ attack vectors – including the use of SNMP – remain an evolving constant. According to Sean Power, security operations manager with DOSarrest, amplification attacks – such as SNMP – are not really that new. “Legitimate SNMP traffic has no need to leave your network and should be prevented from doing so. This attack exists because many organisations fail to prevent this,” he explained. Power went on to say that the effectiveness of the attack stems from the fact that any Web site can be targeted and requires very little effort to produce excessive traffic, since it relies on third party unsecured networks to do most of the heavy lifting for the attack. “Blocking these attacks is best done via your edge devices as far removed from the targets as possible,” he said, adding that if the attack is large enough that it is overwhelming your edge devices, then you need to look at cloud-based technology for cleaning the traffic. Also commenting on the report, Tom Cross, director of security research for Lancope, said that many people who launch attacks on the Internet do so using toolkits that make the process of launching attacks as easy as installing a software application and running it. “DDoS attacks have become increasingly popular, there are many ways to launch them and lots of different tools circulating that launch attacks in different ways. As a consequence, anyone providing service on the Internet should be prepared for volumetric traffic floods involving any kind of Internet traffic,” he explained. Cross says that it is also important that people do not allow their networks to serve as reflectors that attackers can use to amplify their denial of service attacks. “To that end, DNS, SNMP, NTP, and Voice over IP services in particular should be checked to make sure that they cannot be used by an anonymous third party as a reflector. Locking down these services is part of being a good citizen of the Internet,” he said. Source: http://www.scmagazineuk.com/repeat-attacks-hit-two-thirds-of-ddos-victims/article/348960/