Category Archives: DDoS Vendors

185,000+ vulnerable Wi-Fi cameras just waiting to be hijacked

A generic wireless camera manufactured by a Chinese company and sold around the world under different names and brands can be easily hijacked and/or roped into a botnet. The flaw that allows this to happen is found in a custom version of GoAhead, a lightweight embedded web server that has been fitted into the devices. This and other vulnerabilities have been found by security researcher Pierre Kim, who tested one of the branded cameras – … More ?

Read this article:
185,000+ vulnerable Wi-Fi cameras just waiting to be hijacked

7 Security Steps To Defend Your Company Fram A DDoS Attack

Of all the cybersecurity threats today’s businesses face, distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks are among the most complex and devastating. This type of breach involves multiple compromised systems that work in conjunction to shut down service. Although security technology is becoming more sophisticated, so are hackers, and you don’t want to be caught unprepared if (or more likely, when) your company’s data gets compromised. Below, a few members of Forbes Technology Council each offer one important prevention measure to help your IT department defend against a DDoS attack. 1. Continue To Add Layers Of Defense Remain vigilant, continuing to add layers of security as they become available. Also provide your department with signs to look for so they have a better idea of potential threats. This provides for a much more proactive approach to security. – Chalmers Brown, Due 2. Practice Your Response Plan Have a plan on what to do and who should do it, then do a dry run against it a few times a year. Go further than just your IT team – involve your vendors, executive team, etc. and ask for feedback on what would help them help you in the face of a DDoS attack. Update your plan each time. This practice helps your team execute fast and has the added benefit of showing those around you that you’re prepared. – Brian Fritton, Patch of Land 3. Use A Web Application Firewall (WAF) A Web Application Firewall (WAF) is your best line of defense against a DDoS attack. It acts like an antivirus that blocks all malicious attacks on your website. It sits above your application at the network level to provide protection before the attacks reach your server. Using a WAF not only protects you against DDoS attacks, but also improves application performance and enhances user experience. – Thomas Griffin, OptinMonster 4. Leverage Cloud Services And Educate Yourself Continually Cloud providers will handle security better than you can do in-house — especially if you’re a target. Even the U.S. government leverages cloud providers to consult and augment security. Amazon has DDoS mitigation services, and their DNS is both inexpensive and secure. Educate yourself to stay aware of the potential threats and mitigation services that are available to you. – Tim Maliyil, AlertBoot 5. Help Employees Educate Each Other Since our inception, we’ve had a personal ‘buddy’ assigned to any new team member. They are responsible for teaching the new person all of the dos and don’ts of the department, and also get them more culturally aligned with the team/company. – Pin Chen, ONTRAPORT 6. Get Senior Management Involved In Security Planning It is critical for companies to include senior management in DDoS prevention planning. Most attacks are due to poor ongoing security practices or setups. Ransomware attacks alone cost over $1B in 2017. Companies should consider cloud solutions that offer cost-effective managed security solutions, with ongoing security and maintenance updates, so that they can focus on building their core business. – Cristina Dolan, Trading Screen 7. Segment Your IoT Devices Behind A Firewall While DDoS attacks are difficult to prevent, you can minimize the impact by enabling DDoS and flood protection on your organization’s firewalls. To restore order quickly in the event of an attack, develop a DDoS response plan. To minimize the chance of your IoT infrastructure being used in a DDoS attack, make sure all IoT devices are segmented on a dedicated safe zone behind a firewall. – Bill Conner, SonicWall Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2017/03/07/7-security-steps-to-defend-your-company-fram-a-ddos-attack/#4a04a540408

Businesses blame rivals for DDoS attacks

Industrial sabotage is considered to be the most likely reason behind a distributed denial of service attack, a study has revealed More than 40% of businesses hit by a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack worldwide believe their competitors were behind it, research by Kaspersky Lab and B2B International has revealed. Rival firms are considered more likely culprits than cyber criminals, which were cited as suspects by just 38% of DDoS victims on average. Industrial sabotage is considered to be the most likely reason behind a DDoS attack, coming out higher than political conspiracy and personal vendettas against a business. Typically, DDoS attacks target web servers and aim to make websites unavailable to users. Although no data is stolen, the interruption to the service can be costly in terms of lost business damage to reputation. For example, a massive DDoS attack on Luxembourg’s government servers that started on 27 February 2017 reportedly lasted more than 24 hours, and affected more than a hundred websites. The joint Kaspersky Lab, B2B International study, which polled 4,000 businesses in 25 countries, found that only 20% of DDoS victims overall blamed foreign governments and secret service organisations, with the same proportion suspecting disgruntled former employees. Companies in Asia Pacific are the most suspicious of competitors, with 56% blaming their rivals for DDoS attacks and 28% blaming foreign governments. Personal grudges also carry more suspicion in the region too, with 33% blaming former staff. In Western Europe, only 37% of companies suspect foul play by their competitors, with 17% blaming foreign governments. Looking at attitudes by business size, businesses at the smaller end of the scale are more likely to suspect their rivals of staging an experienced DDoS attack. The study found that 48% of small and medium business representatives believe this to be the case compared with only 36% of enterprises. In contrast, respondents from big companies put more blame on former employees and foreign governments. “DDoS attacks have been a threat for many years, and are one of the most popular weapons in a cyber criminals’ arsenal,” said Russ Madley, head of B2B at Kaspersky Lab UK. “The problem we face is that DDoS attacks can be set up cheaply and easily, from almost anyone, whether that be a competitor, a dismissed employee, socio-political protesters or just a lone wolf with a grudge. “It’s therefore imperative that businesses find an effective way to safeguard themselves from such attacks,” he said. Significant advances in DDoS attacks There were significant advances in DDoS attacks in the last quarter of 2016, according to Kaspersky, with the longest DDoS attack in lasting 292 hours or 12.2 days, which set a record for 2016 and was significantly longer than the previous quarter’s maximum of 184 hours. The last quarter of 2016 also saw the first massive DDoS attacks using the Mirai IoT (internet of things) botnet technology, including attacks on Dyn’s Domain Name System (DNS) infrastructure and on Deutsche Telekom, which knocked 900K Germans offline in November. There were also similar attacks on internet service providers (ISPs) in Ireland, the UK and Liberia, all using IoT devices controlled by Mirai technology and partly targeting home routers in an attempt to create new botnets. Stakeholders recognise lack of security in IoT devices According to Kaspersky, stakeholders worldwide, in particular in the US and EU, recognise the lack of security inherent in the functional design of IoT devices and the need to set up a common IoT security ecosystem. Kaspersky expects to see the emergence of further Mirai botnet modifications and a general increase in IoT botnet activity in 2017. Researchers at Kaspersky Lab also believe that the DDoS attacks seen so far are just a starting point initiated by various actors to draw up IoT devices into the actors’ own botnets, test drive Mirai technology and develop attack vectors. First, they demonstrate once again that financial services like the bitcoin trading and blockchain platforms CoinSecure of India and BTC-e of Bulgaria, or William Hill, one of Britain’s biggest betting sites, which took days to come back to full service, were at the highest risk in the fourth quarter and are likely to remain so throughout 2017. Second, cyber criminals have learnt to manage and launch very sophisticated, carefully planned, and constantly changing multi-vector DDoS attacks adapted to the mitigation policy and capacity of the attacked organisation. Kaspersky Lab’s analysis shows that the cybercriminals in several cases tracked in 2016 started with a combination of various attack vectors gradually checking out a bank’s network and web services to find a point of service failure. Once DDoS mitigation and other countermeasures were initiated, researchers said the attack vectors changed over a period of several days. DDoS enters its next stage of evolution Overall, they said these attacks show that the DDoS landscape entered the next stage of its evolution in 2016 with new technology, massive attack power, as well as highly skilled and professional cyber criminals. However, the Kaspersky researchers note that unfortunately, this tendency has not yet found its way into the cyber security policies of many organisations that are still not ready or are unclear about the necessary investments in DDoS protection services. Source: http://www.computerweekly.com/news/450414239/Businesses-blame-rivals-for-DDoS-attacks

Visit site:
Businesses blame rivals for DDoS attacks

Advanced Windows botnet spreads Mirai malware

Kaspersky Lab experts are analyzing the first Windows-based spreader for the Mirai malware as part of a concerted effort to close down Mirai botnets in the wild. The Windows bot appears to have been created by a developer with more advanced skills than the attackers who unleashed the massive Mirai-powered DDoS attacks in late 2016, a fact that has worrying implications for the future use and targets of Mirai-based attacks. The malware author is likely … More ?

Blame the US, not China, for the recent surge in massive cyberattacks

The internet’s new scourge is hugely damaging global attacks that harness armies of routers, cameras, and other connected gadgets—the so-called Internet of Things (IoT)—to direct floods of traffic that can take down swaths of the network. The blame so far has largely fallen on the Chinese manufacturers who churn out devices with shoddy security on the cheap. But all those devices have to be plugged in somewhere for them to used maliciously. And American consumers are increasingly the ones plugging them in. Nearly a quarter of the internet addresses behind these distributed denial-of-service, or DDoS, attacks are located in the United States, newresearch from network services firm Akamai has found. Some 180,000 US IP addresses took part in DDoS attacks in the last quarter of 2016, it found—more than four times as many as addresses originating in China. Akamai’s findings are particularly notable because the armies of hacked devices that carry out DDoS attacks—such as those controlled by the Mirai malware—don’t bother covering their tracks. That means the IP addresses are far more likely to genuinely correspond to a location within a certain country, the report’s authors write. The findings also end an era of Chinese dominance in DDoS attacks. Over the previous year, China has accounted for the highest proportion of IP addresses taking part in such attacks globally. Now the US is the clear leader, accounting for 24% of such addresses. The UK and Germany are a distant second and third. (To be clear, though, wherever the attacking devices’ IP addresses are, the person controlling them could be located anywhere.) The huge number of devices taking part in DDoS attacks in the US means regulation there, and in Europe, could stem the flood of damaging traffic. Of course, IoT regulation is a thorny issue—essentially, no US federal agency really wants to take the problem on—and there remain technical questions over how to actually go about blocking the attacks. Still, it’s a lot clearer now that simply pointing the finger at China isn’t enough. Source: https://qz.com/912419/akamai-akam-report-a-quarter-of-ddos-ip-addresses-are-now-from-the-us/

View article:
Blame the US, not China, for the recent surge in massive cyberattacks

Monitoring scanning activities that could lead to IoT compromises

IoT devices are ideal targets for attackers looking to build DDoS botnets because they have limited or non-existent security features. Some IoT devices utilize hard-coded default passwords. Many devices have unnecessary services running that can be exploited, and others have unprotected management interfaces. Most important for DDoS attackers, IoT devices offer high-speed connections that are always on, which allows for a large, predictable amount of attack traffic volume per compromised device. Monitoring login attempts Looking … More ?

See original article:
Monitoring scanning activities that could lead to IoT compromises

DDoS Attack Takes Down Austrian Parliament Website

The DDoS attack, one of the most common cyber threats, is being investigated by authorities The Austrian parliament’s website was hit by a suspected cyber attack over the weekend which took the site down for 20 minutes. Hackers are believed to have used a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack to flood the website with digital service requests and, although no data was lost, authorities are now investigating the attack. “The hacker attack was most likely a so-called DDoS-attack; a similar attack took place last November targeting the websites of the Foreign Affairs and Defence Ministries,” the parliament said in a statement. Cyber attack One of the most common cyber threats around, DDoS attacks have been growing in size and prevalence in recent times, with Corero Network Security predicting that such threats will become the top security priority for businesses and the new norm in 2017. “While the Mirai botnet is certainly fearsome in terms of its size, its capacity to wreak havoc is also dictated by the various attack vectors it employs, said Dave Larson, CTO/COO at Corero Network Security. “If a variety of new and complex techniques were added to its arsenal next year, we may see a substantial escalation in the already dangerous DDoS landscape, with the potential for frequent, Terabit-scale DDoS events which significantly disrupt our Internet availability.” In January, a DDoS attack was responsible for an outage at Lloyds Banking Group that left customers unable to access online banking services for three days, after web security firm Imperva had earlier that month issued a warning to businesses after fending off the largest DDoS attack ever recorded on its network. But the most high-profile attack in recent months affected domain name service provider Dyn and resulted in a slew major sites – including Twitter, Spotify and Reddit – being taken offline. Source: http://www.silicon.co.uk/security/ddos-attack-austrian-parliament-website-204381

View the original here:
DDoS Attack Takes Down Austrian Parliament Website

DDoS attack on Dyn costly for company: claim

A distributed denial of service attack on Dynamic Network Services, otherwise known as Dyn, in October 2016, led to the company losing a considerable amount of business, according to data from the security services company BitSight. A report at the Security Ledger website said while Internet users endured short-term pain because they were cut off from popular websites during the attack, the company, Dyn, lost the business of about 8% of the domains — about 14,500 — it was hosting shortly thereafter. This figure was based on statistics in a talk given on 24 January by Dan Dahlberg, a research scientist at BitSight Technologies in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Dyn is based in Manchester, New Hampshire. It was recently bought by Oracle Corporation. During the outage, Dyn was targeted by hackers who are said to have used digital video recorders and security cameras which were compromised by malware known as Mirai and used to form a massive botnet. The first attack, on 21 October 2016 US time, began at 7.10am EDT (10.10pm AEDT) and, once this was resolved by Dyn, further waves caused disruptions throughout the day. While major US websites like Twitter, Spotify, Netflix and Paypal were disrupted, the application performance management software company Dynatrace said that Australian websites were affected as well. Among the Australian sites that took a hit, Dynatrace listed AAMI, ANZ, BankWest, Coles, The Daily Telegraph, Dan Murphy’s, ebay, HSBC, The Herald Sun, NAB, 9News, The Age, Ticketmaster, The Australian, Woolworths, The Sydney Morning Herald, and Westpac. BitSight provides security rating services for companies. It analysed 178,000 domains that were hosted on Dyn’s managed DNS infrastructure before and after the attacks; of these 145,000 used Dyn exclusively, while the remaining 33,000 used Dyn and others too. After the attack, according to Dahlberg, 139,000 of the 145,000 domains managed exclusively by Dyn continued to use its services, a loss of 4% or 6000 domains. Among domains that used Dyn and other providers as well, there was a loss of 8000 domains, or 24%. Security Ledger said it had tried to get a comment from Dyn but was refused one. It is not clear whether any of the 14,500 domains that were found not to be using Dyn’s services in the aftermath of the attack returned to the provider. Source: http://www.itwire.com/security/76717-ddos-attack-on-dyn-costly-for-company-claim.html

View the original here:
DDoS attack on Dyn costly for company: claim

SQL Sequel: Sequel Slammer worm resurfaces after more than a decade

SQL Slammer, a fast-moving worm that generated a wave of distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks in 2013, mysteriously resumed high levels of activity in late 2016 after more than a decade of dormancy. According to a company blog post Thursday, Check Point Software Technologies detected a “massive” surge in SQL Slammer attacks between Nov. 28 and Dec. 4, 2016. “What we’ve been seeing is not the actual worm, but its attempts to reach more servers,” said Maya Horowitz, group manager, threat Intelligence at Check Point, in an email interview with SC Media. “Therefore we cannot know for sure if any changes have been [made to] the worm or the vulnerabilities it exploits.” When it first surfaced in 2003, the worm managed to infect tens of thousands of servers and routers in a matter of minutes by exploiting a buffer overflow vulnerability (CVE-2002-0649) in Microsoft SQL Server 2000 or Microsoft SQL Server Data Engine 2000 – both of which are no longer supported. These infected, exploited machines would then bombard ransom IP addresses with an enormous stream of malicious packets that would infect other vulnerable systems, while simultaneously overloading Internet-based network devices with traffic. Microsoft patched this vulnerability in Jan. 2003 and over the years has issued multiple new versions of the affected products. This makes these latest attacks ever stranger, because unless the worm has evolved in some way, it is hard to imagine that users remain susceptible to this threat. “One theory to why it’s attempting to make a comeback is that cybercriminals are seeking easy ways to cause DoS and slow down the entire Internet, just like with the recent Mirai botnet,” said Horowitz. “And reusing old malware is the easiest way.” Source:https://www.scmagazine.com/sql-sequel-sequel-slammer-worm-resurfaces-after-more-than-a-decade/article/636156/

39% of businesses not ready to protect themselves against DDoS

Companies are not ready to protect themselves against DDoS, with four in ten (39%) businesses unclear about the most effective protection strategy to combat this type of attack, according to research from Kaspersky Lab. A lack of knowledge and protection is putting businesses at risk of grinding to a halt. DDoS attacks can quickly incapacitate a targeted business’s workflow, bringing business-critical processes to a stop. However, the research found that nearly a fifth (16%) of businesses are not protected from DDoS attacks at all, and half (49%) rely on built-in hardware for protection. This is not effective against the increasing number of large-scale attacks and ‘smart’ DDoS attacks which are hard to filter with standard methods. Large-scale cyberattacks are now commonplace, such as the recent attack on telecommunications provider StarHub, which faced a high-profile DDoS attack in October last year. Hackers are also showing a preference for DDoS attacks, with the proliferation of IoT devices today. As IoT devices have weak security protocols, they are easy targets for hackers to launch DDoS attacks from. As IoT devices are forecasted to hit 21 billion in 2020, each potential entry point into an organisation increases vulnerability to DDoS attacks. Many businesses are in fact aware that DDoS is a threat to them – of those that have anti-DDoS protection in place, a third (33%) said this was because risk assessments had identified DDoS as a potential problem, and one in five (18%) said they have been attacked in the past. For some, compliance, rather than awareness of the security threat, is the main driver, with almost half (43%) saying regulation is the reason they protect themselves. The problem for businesses is that, in many cases, they may assume they’re already protected. Almost half (40%) of the organizations surveyed fail to put measures in place because they think their Internet service provider will provide protection, and one in three (30%) think data center or infrastructure partners will protect them. This is also not always effective, because these organizations mostly protect businesses from large-scale or standard attacks, while ‘smart’ attacks, such as those using encryption or imitating user behavior, require an expert approach. Moreover, the survey found that a third (30%) fail to take action because they think they are unlikely to be targeted by DDoS attacks. Surprisingly, one in ten (12%) even admit to thinking that a small amount of downtime due to DDoS would not cause a major issue for the company. The reality is that any company can be targeted because such attacks are easy for cybercriminals to launch. What’s more, the potential cost to a victim can reach millions. “As we’ve seen with the recent attacks, DDoS is extremely disruptive, and on the rise,” says Kirill Ilganaev, Head of Kaspersky DDoS Protection at Kaspersky Lab. “When hackers launch a DDoS attack, the damage can be devastating for the business that’s being targeted because it disables a company’s online presence. As a result business workflow comes to a halt, mission-critical processes cannot be completed and reputations can be ruined. Online services and IT infrastructure are just too important to leave unguarded. That’s why specialized DDoS protection solution should be considered an essential part of any effective protection strategy in business today.” Source: http://www.networksasia.net/article/39-businesses-not-ready-protect-themselves-against-ddos.1486046674

See original article:
39% of businesses not ready to protect themselves against DDoS