Over 1,000 People Have Signed Change.org Petition Following September Cyberattack Rutgers students are frustrated with the university’s lackluster cybersecurity, considering the school raised tuition in part to fund $3 million worth of network upgrades after several cyberattacks brought the school to a screeching halt last semester. But on September 28, Rutgers University experienced another distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack, the fifth such attack in less than a year. That attack shut down the school’s wireless internet service, and many other services from 1 a.m. to 2 a.m. and again from 10 a.m. to approximately 3 p.m. The university acknowledged that it was “not well protected” during the first four attacks, but had said it had since begun pouring millions of dollars into its cybersecurity efforts, as we reported. This spending was cited as one of the main reasons Rutgers University’s Board of Governos approved a 2.3% increase in tutition for the 2015-2016 year. Rutgers engineering student Riccardo Mui started a change.org petition imploring Rutgers President Robert Barchi to refund the ineffectual tuition hike. Mui comes from a humble background, raised by an immigrant father who could not support him through college. This is his take on the DDoS attack: Since I came to college, I expected at least decent internet speeds, and while it usually holds up, we get DDoS attacks every time an exam rolls around. Now I would not say anything, yet I feel the need to tell all the students to join together to either get a refund or to make Rutgers change something on their own time. Why? Because Rutger’s spent over 3 million on upgrading the network, yet only 160,000 actually went to physical upgrades. Also, they used Incapsula as a DSoS attack defender, which is decent for websites, but definitely not for a University. Besides, we literally wasted all of our money because as soon as an attack was launched, it took down the network. Since there was a tuition increase, it is only fair that we get that money back. The petition reached 300 signatures within an hour, and 750 signatures within the first fifteen hours, and now has more than 1,000 signatures. The “Reasons for Signing” section is telling. Some students were simply angry that the university did not provide what they felt they deserved. Others suspected that the school did not even invest the money in cybersecurity at all. David Park commented, “Only a small percentage of the 3 million raised was actually used to improve Rutgers’ cyber defense system. If Rutgers doesn’t actually use all the money it’s raised from increasing the tuition for its actual purpose, refund the students.” Several students brought up Rutgers’ habit of spending big on athletics. For example, Chetan Kini wrote, “You can’t increase my tuition and then have something like this occur; it’s unacceptable. I’m pretty sure you gave my money to the damn football team since that’s where all our funding goes.” As Leslie Brighton said, “If Don Smith [Rutgers’s Vice President of Information Technology] was doing his job, I wouldn’t even know who he was.” Source: http://newbrunswicktoday.com/article/rutgers-students-want-refunds-after-fifth-ddos-attack-one-year
Originally posted here:
Rutgers Students Want Refunds After Fifth DDoS Attack in One Year

Internet users Wednesday night protested the plans for a single gateway by attacking and bringing down the main websites of the prime minister, the Defence Ministry and the Ministry of Information and Communication Technology. Communications experts said “denial of service” attacks flooded the three sites, effectively making them impossible to access. The sites began to recover early Wednesday. The three sites went offline at about 10pm Wednesday, after netizens warned they intended to attack, and the government said such attacks would be treated as violations of the Computer Crime Act. The ICT deputy permanent secretary, Somsak Khaosuwan, claimed his ministry’s site did not crash because of an attack, but because it was overloaded by visitors monitoring the planned attack. Sites affected as of early Wednesday were the main government information website thaigov.go.th, the ICT ministry’s site at mict.go.th and the defence ministry’s website, mod.go.th. By early Wednesday, however, only the MICT site remained inaccessible, possibly because authorities had actually taken it offline. Warnings on Wednesday afternoon from credible sources in the Thai hacking community said they planned to attack government websites to protest the recent disclosure of government plans to reduce internet access to a single gateway, controlled by CAT Telecom Co. It appeared that the government site takedowns were by internet users, who answered calls on social media to go on online and continuously click refresh, causing overloads on the three targeted sites. The simultaneous denial-of-service attack works like normal attacks by over-exceeding a website’s capacity to handle internet traffic. But whereas normal attacks are carried out by a program or bot, Wednesday night’s protest was carried out by thousands of online users. After the secret plan was accidentally disclosed by a government press release, authorities sent out Deputy Prime Minister Prajin Junthong to try to spin the plan. He said that the single gateway initiative was only a proposition and that no “firm decisions have been made.” Critics of the plan idea contend it will take away freedom of information, with some even comparing it to the tightened grip of a communist country. A change.org petition opposing the single gateway initiative passed 100,000 signatures as of Wednesday. Source: http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/security/714432/single-gateway-protest-halts-government-websites