Category Archives: DDoS Vendors

Cyber-security’s dirty little secret: It’s not as bad as you think

And as for botnets … on their way out A new research report from the Global Commission on Internet Governance has reached a surprising conclusion: cyberspace is actually getting safer.…

Excerpt from:
Cyber-security’s dirty little secret: It’s not as bad as you think

The most damaging ramifications of DDoS attacks

More than half of IT security professionals (52 percent) said loss of customer trust and confidence were the most damaging consequences of DDoS attacks for their businesses, according to a survey cond…

View article:
The most damaging ramifications of DDoS attacks

Envato Targeted by DDoS Attack, WordPress Theme Authors Report Major Decline in Sales

If you’ve attempted to access Themeforest or any other site on the Envato network lately, you may have encountered some down time. The company updated customers and community members today, attributing the technical difficulties to a DDoS attack: Since July 1, Envato has been the target of a sustained DDoS (distributed denial of service) attack. The attacker, whose motive and identity are unknown, has repeatedly flooded our servers with high levels of traffic, causing our services to be unavailable at various times. The most recent outage happened over the weekend when Envato Market was down for three hours on Friday and one hour on Sunday. This is a significant chunk of time for a market that paid out $224 million dollars to its members in 2014. The downtime has also impacted WordPress theme authors, who continue to dominate the Envato’s marketplace. According to Ben Chan, the company’s director of growth and revenue, 30 of the 31 sellers who make up the Power Elite wall of fame (selling $1 million+ worth of items) are WordPress product authors. The power of the WordPress economy on Envato is undeniable, but sales have taken a sharp decline in the past couple of months, even before the DDoS attack. According to PremiumWP, which cites reports from elite theme author Chris Robinson of Contempo and many others, sales have suddenly declined 50-70%. “Sales have declined over 70% starting from May with each passing day getting worse,” Robinson said in the members’ forum. “I’ve also spoken with other elite authors explaining the same thing. One example going from $1500/day to $700 – sure that’s still a great deal of money BUT what the hell is happening? “This isn’t just one or maybe twenty authors, it is marketplace wide affecting everyone. A marketplace wide decline in sales of this magnitude doesn’t just happen due to vacations, or other buyer factors. Going through the years of sales data (since 2008) this has never happened, I’ve personally gone from $2-3000/week to less than $700/week…that’s insane!” With new authors and products entering the market every day, the market share for established authors is slowly diminishing, but members are not convinced that this is the sole cause of the sharp drop in sales. FinalDestiny of TeoThemes, another author whose sales are declining, blames the one-size-fits-all theme products for gobbling up a greater slice of the market share. “Everybody is tired of these huge, monster multipurpose themes having the same price as normal themes, and that’s pretty much killing the marketplaces. But Envato couldn’t care less, as long as they get their share,” he said. In another thread, which ended up getting locked, there are 27 pages of comments from users speculating about why their sales have been dropping. Members cite seasonal buying fluctuations, piracy, Themeforest’s recent drop in Google search rankings, VAT and hidden price additions on checkout, and unfair pricing advantages for monster themes that claim to do everything, among other possible causes. In one thread, titled “More than 50% sales drop for most of the authors. Does TF care for Authors?“, an Envato community officer offered the following comment: We don’t really give sales updates over the forums other than to say your sales can go up and down for a multitude of reasons. Try not to assume the sky is falling every time the USA has a long weekend We have fast and slow periods throughout the year same as any business, and your portfolio will no doubt have peaks and valleys as well. This kind of generic reply has left theme authors scratching their heads, despite multiple threads in the forums popping up with concerns from those who are alarmed by the sudden drop. Many WordPress theme authors depend on Themeforest as their primary source of income. In one reply, the Aligator Studio seller sums up their concerns and frustration with the inability to convince Envato of the unusual circumstances that are affecting large numbers of sellers: We are not talking about valleys and peaks, we’re talking about a general traffic and sales fall, from New Year until now, especially after April. We’re not talking about regular ups and downs (sometimes steeper, sometimes not), due to longer weekends, summer holidays, and general and the usual stuff happening here in the last couple of years. It’s not a sky falling – it’s inability to pay our bills, we’re not fanatics that foresee the end of the world. Envato has yet to provide an official statement about the marketplace-wide decline in sales, apart from recognizing the network’s unavailability due to the recent DDoS attack. Source: http://wptavern.com/envato-targeted-by-ddos-attack-wordpress-theme-authors-report-major-decline-in-sales

View article:
Envato Targeted by DDoS Attack, WordPress Theme Authors Report Major Decline in Sales

New Reddit rival Voat hit by DDoS attack

A would-be rival to Reddit called Voat is getting media attention. Is that what led someone to launch a DDoS attack on Sunday? A group of disaffected users of the news site Reddit, often called the “front page of the internet,” recently migrated to a new community site called Voat. But in the wake of media attention for Voat, it appears another group decided to launch a Distributed Denial of Service attack in an attempt to take it offline. The attack, which began Sunday night, was confirmed on Twitter by Voat: The maintenance on our servers ended several hours ago, but we are still being hit with a layer 7 DDoS attack as Confirmed by CloudFlare. — Voat (@voatco) July 12, 2015 The tweet cites CloudFlare, a security company that can help sites manage DDoS attacks. Such attacks typically involve antagonists who harness botnets in order to direct massive amounts of traffic at a website’s servers, and knock it offline. The attack does not appear to have taken Voat’s website down for any length of time, though a message on its homepage says the incident has forced it to cut off access to the site from various apps: “In order to keep Voat at least somewhat responsive, we’ve bumped up CloudFlare security settings which essentially breaks most Voat third party apps currently on the market. We are sorry about this and we are working on a solution and taking this time to optimize our source code even further.” It’s unclear who is responsible for the DDoS attack, though some are suggesting (on Reddit and Voat naturally) that Reddit users may be involved. Although Voat is an obscure site (its attraction apparently lies in its reputation as a “troll haven”), its emergence – and the DDoS response to it – underscores once again the volatile, migratory nature of online communities. As my colleague Mathew Ingram explained, such communities can be “like an anthill, but one where there is no queen or recognized authority or even common purpose — one where all the ants wander around doing whatever they want, whether it’s building something beautiful or destroying things just for the sake of destroying them.” Source: http://fortune.com/2015/07/13/new-reddit-rival-voat-hit-by-ddos-attack/

Read the article:
New Reddit rival Voat hit by DDoS attack

Planetside 2, H1Z1, Everquest servers under DDoS attacks

Lizard Squad, the notorious hacking group, is claiming responsibility for DDoS attacks on game servers for Planetside 2, Everquest, H1Z1, and more. Planetside 2 and H1Z1 developer Daybreak has fallen victim to DDoS attacks on their servers. The attacks are perpetrated by Lizard Squad, and have affected the game’s websites, as well as servers players connect to. To understand why this is happening, we’ll have to go all the way back to August of last year, when a wide-range of DDoS attacks targeted a large number of gaming servers, among the affected was Daybreak Games (then Sony Online Entertainment). Members of the same hacking group then grounded the plane company president John Smedley was on, by tweeting a bomb threat to American Airlines. Fast forward to last week, the hacker responsible was convicted but managed to avoid jail time. Understandably, Smedley was not pleased, vowing to go after him in court. Which is more or less what sparked the attacks against his company’s servers. Source: http://www.vg247.com/2015/07/10/planetside-2-h1z1-everquest-servers-under-ddos-attacks/  

Continued here:
Planetside 2, H1Z1, Everquest servers under DDoS attacks

DDoS ransom notes: why paying up will get you nowhere

DDoS attacks are getting more frequent and more harmful, but the key is not to be blackmailed If a large man stopped you on a street corner and told you that if you hand him five dollars, he won’t punch you in the face, what would you do? First you would sarcastically think to yourself welcome to New York, because that’s where this would happen. Following that, you could say no. You could try to run. You could try to defend yourself. But with a matter of moments to think about it, you’d probably just hand over the five dollars. It doesn’t feel good to give money to an unethical person to stop him from doing a terrible thing to you, but hey, face punch averted. Three days later, there he is again. Same offer only now its ten dollars. He already knows you don’t want to be punched in the face and he also knows you don’t seem to have any other plan for dealing with his threats. Handing over that first five dollars set you up to keep being victimised. A DDoS ransom note has a similar strategy behind it. The difference is that you don’t have mere seconds to make your decision. Forewarned is forearmed, so get your shield up. DDoS attack motivations A DDoS attack is a distributed denial of service attack, which is an attack that seeks to deny the services of a website, network, server or other internet service to its users by interfering with an internet-connected host. While victims of this kind of attack may throw their hands up in the air and ask why me, it isn’t necessarily a rhetorical question. Many people assume DDoS attacks stem from business rivalries, or are an attempt to gain a competitive advantage. In some cases this is true, but it’s far from being the only reason for DDoS attacks. DDoS attacks may stem from ideological or political differences, and in some instances they can even be equated with a hate crime when certain groups are targeted. The other main causes of DDoS attacks essentially come down to script kiddies being script kiddies. Whether it’s a turf war between online groups, websites being randomly targeted for DDoS experiments, a challenge to see what attackers are capable of, or hacktivist groups trying to gain attention (the Lizard Squad, anyone?), a lot of the reasons for DDoS attacks can be summed up to just being a jerk on the internet. DDoS ransom notes no exception Speaking of jerks on the internet. For about as long as DDoS attacks have been a thing, so too have DDoS attack extortion attempts. ‘We have a botnet army prepared to take down your site. You have 24 hours to pay us $1000.’ This sort of ransom note is typically followed by a warning shot low-level DDoS attack, just so you know the attackers are capable of what they’re threatening. A year ago, even a few months ago, these DDoS ransom notes were largely attributed to low-level cyber criminals, or kids trying to make some easy cash. But the recent actions of DD4BC, a high-level hacking group responsible for some high-level extortions on bitcoin companies, have shown us that this isn’t true. DD4BC have been threatening 400+ Gbps DDoS flood attacks. While their actual attacks have been shown to be much smaller scale application layer DDoS attacks, peaking at about 150 requests per second accompanied by network layer attacks maxing out at 40 Gbps, these attacks would still be enough to take down most small to medium-sized websites. DD4BC have been attempting to extort bitcoin and gaming companies since November of 2014. Lately they seem to have begun targeting the payment industry as well. How to respond when you receive a DDoS ransom note Thank your mom for all that just ignore it advice she gave you growing up, because one of the best responses here is definitely no response. If you pay the ransom, not only are you out that money, but you’ve also identified your website as one that has no professional DDoS protection. That will put you on the exploitable victim list with a big exclamation mark after your name. Some companies have decided that they’re not content with merely ignoring the ransom demands. One of DD4BC’s first publicised extortion attempts was against the Bitalo Bitcoin exchange, who not only refused to capitulate, but slapped a big ol’ bounty on DD4BC’s head. That bounty was added to by another bitcoin company, Bitmain, in March. Another high-profile website, meetup.com, also went public with their fight against a blackmail-related DDoS attack in March 2014. Ignoring these DDoS ransom notes or actively fighting back against would-be extortionists is unequivocally what your organisation should do in the event that you receive one. However, to do either of these things absolutely requires that you have professional DDoS protection. You don’t poke the bear unless you know it can’t get out of its cage. If that means onboarding protection as soon as you get a note, then so be it. A better plan is to have professional DDoS mitigation in place before you ever land on the list of some hacking group. Blackmail is just one of many reasons DDoS attacks take place, and DDoS attacks are getting stronger and more devastating all the time. Source: http://www.information-age.com/technology/security/123459804/ddos-ransom-notes-why-paying-will-get-you-nowhere

Read this article:
DDoS ransom notes: why paying up will get you nowhere

Another malware building toolkit leaked, botnets already popping up

Another malware building toolkit has been leaked, allowing less tech-savvy crooks to generate a fully functional variant of the KINS banking Trojan and to inject its configuration code in a JPG file i…

Read More:
Another malware building toolkit leaked, botnets already popping up

‘Zombie’ network protocols become DDoS threats

Attackers won’t let RIPv1 rest in peace. Attackers continue to search for obsolete protocols that are no longer used but still running on networked computer systems in order to abuse them as denial of service amplifiers. Content delivery network firm Akamai’s PLXsert security team discovered that the routing information protocol version 1, introduced in 1988, was used in a denial of service attack against its customers in May this year. RIPv1 was designed for small networks in the early internet era. It broadcasts lists of routes and updates to devices listening for RIPv1 information. A small, 24-byte RIPv1 request with a forged source IP address can result in multiple, 504-byte response payloads, creating a large amount of unsolicited traffic directed towards victims’ networks and flooding them. Attackers were in particular looking for routers that contain large amounts of routes in the RIPv1 database, so as to maximise the traffic volumes and damage done to target networks. Internet luminaries disagree however as to how much of a threat RIPv1 represents. APNIC chief scientist Geoff Huston told iTnews  RIPv1 is late 80s technology that routes the now abandoned Class A/B/C network address structure. “I find it hard to think that RIPv1 is connected to the global internet and that there are enough of them out there to constitute a real threat,” Huston said. Finding even one site in 2015 that is running RIPv1 is “like discovering a Ford Model T on the streets still in working order,” Huston said. Director of architecture for internet performance company Dyn, Joe Abley, pointed out that the problem is not that operators use RIPv1 for routing, it’s that administrators leave RPv1 turned on. The protocol has been unsuitable for the past two decades because it doesn’t work with classless inter-domain routing. “Just because you no longer have any use for a protocol doesn’t mean you always remember to turn it off,” he told iTnews . “What is happening is that ancient systems that have been hidden in dark corners for decades are suddenly jumping out into the sunlight and running amok because someone realised they could provoke them into bad behaviour, from a distance.” He said there are end-systems connected to the internet that support the ancient routing protocol and which have it turned on by default. Old Sun Microsystems Solaris servers are examples of such systems that are now being abused as packet amplifiers in denial of service attacks. RIPv1 does not use authentication, leaving it wide open to anyone on the internet to connect to. The attack is not fundamentally different from reflection attacks using the domain name system, chargen, simple network management protocol, or any one of a variety of user datagram-based protocols, Abley said. “This attack is not new and special really, although the fact that it uses RIP certainly brings a roguish twinkle to this aged network administrator’s eye,” he said. It can however cause large traffic floods. “Akamai’s Prolexic team have seen attacks that delivered over 10 gigabit per second of traffic towards a single victim,” Abley said. “I wouldn’t categorise that as ‘not really a problem’, especially if I was the one on the receiving end.” Abley said as with most amplification attacks, “poking the bear from a great distance relies upon being able to fake the source address of the stick.” There would be fewer opportunities for this happen if network operators followed the advice in Internet Engineering Task Force best current practice documents such as BCP38, which details network ingress filtering and similar texts to protect their networks. Source: http://www.itnews.com.au/News/406090,zombie-network-protocols-become-ddos-threats.aspx#ixzz3eqpq5n9E

Continue reading here:
‘Zombie’ network protocols become DDoS threats

Rise in DDoS reflection attacks using abandoned routing protocol

There's been an increase in the use of outdated Routing Information Protocol version one (RIPv1) for reflection and amplification attacks, according to Akamai. RIPv1 is a fast, easy way to dynamica…

Original post:
Rise in DDoS reflection attacks using abandoned routing protocol

Anonymous celebrates Canada Day with DDos attacks

For Canadians, July 1 is Canada Day—but to Anonymous, it’s also the perfect occasion to launch a protest campaign of distributed denial of service (DDos) attacks. The internet activist group announced on Wednesday morning that it had planned #AntiCanadaDay protests in support of its #OpCyberPrivacy campaign, created in opposition to Canada’s controversial, recently-passed anti-terror legislation, Bill C-51. The bill grants the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) broad powers—with judicial authoriziation—to do just about anything to “disrupt” and investigate terrorist plots and propaganda, both online and offline. “We protest against the systemic invasion of privacy by government and corperate [sic] entities around the world,” the announcement reads. “We stand ardent in our defiance to all those who would take away our rights and freedoms.” A full list of targets, posted shortly before the #AntiCanadaDay attacks began, lists the websites of Liberal party leader Justin Trudeau, Minister of Justice Peter McKay, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), and the Canadian Senate as “main targets.” A host of other lobbyist groups and senators who voted in favour of Bill C-51 are listed as targets too. “All Canadian government web assests [sic] are fair game,” read the statement. “Lazors free on all federal, provincial and municpal [sic] services.” Shortly after noon, accounts on Twitter associated with the campaign reported that multiple government of Canada websites had been taken offline. When Motherboard attempted to access sites such as Canada.ca and sencanada.ca, for example, pages either loaded slowly, displayed an error, or did not load at all. “Remember hold nothing down for protracted lengths,” said an operation admin in the group’s chat room. “This is after all just a protest.” In a separate chat room interview, members told VICE News reporter Hilary Beaumont that eight people belong to the core #OpCyberPrivacy team. “We all expect blowback for today,” wrote one of the users, but said that it was worth the risk. “This bill violates the charter of rights and freedoms, universal declaration of human rights,” a user said, citing the threat of more invasive spying offline, and the potential to be arrested without a warrant and held without charge. “They make the rules up as they go,” wrote another member. “So if I’m a perfectly law abiding citizen who is impacted greatly by something and I protest I can be arrested [because] criticizing that is terrorism.” By early afternoon, focus had shifted to sites such as the Canadian parliament domain parl.gc.ca, and Conservative party Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s domain pm.gc.ca. The admin said the government was “putting up a good fight.” “They are adding load balancers, moving servers, closing off access,” wrote another user. “Some of the pages up [at the moment] are only cached versions.” The protest is expected to continue until midnight. Source: http://motherboard.vice.com/read/anonymous-is-celebrating-canada-day-in-protest-with-attacks-on-government-sites?utm_source=mbtwitter

Read the original:
Anonymous celebrates Canada Day with DDos attacks