Category Archives: DDoS Vendors

DOSarrest Rolls Out New Website Monitoring Service

VANCOUVER, Jan. 22, 2013 /CNW/ – DOSarrest Internet Security announced a new website monitoring service today called the “ DOSarrest External Monitoring Service ” or “ DEMS ”. This new service is a real-time geographically distributed system, capable of monitoring a number of website performance metrics from three different geographic regions, every 60 seconds, utilizing six different sensors. This service may be purchased as a stand-alone product but is free for all DOSarrest customers that are subscribed to DOSarrest’s industry leading DDoS protection service. DOSarrest’s CTO, Jag Bains states “This is a must have if you’re using a CDN or are hosting some high-end, mission critical websites, and it’s a perfect fit for our fully managed DDoS protection service. This combined with our existing traffic metrics gives us and our customers the best visibility in the DDoS protection services arena.” Jag Bains adds “Although there are similar types of services available from third parties, our customers can also choose to have the DOSarrest support staff investigate, pin-point and advise the customer on a plan of action, 24/7/365. No such service exists today that offers this type of customer support”. Mark Teolis, GM of DOSarrest comments. “It’s a very intuitive and elegant design.  I use it myself to view the status of all of our customers’ websites. At a glance and without a click, I can tell real-time if anyone is down from six different vantage points, and can easily drill down to a specific site and timeline of events for that site. Many Content Delivery Networks do not offer such a service to their customers. Their customers would have no idea if there was an issue accessing their website in a different region of the country or globe.” More information on this service can be found at:  http://www.dosarrest.com/dems About DOSarrest Internet Security: DOSarrest founded in 2007 in Vancouver, BC, Canada is one of only a couple of companies worldwide to specialize in only cloud based DDoS protection services. Their global client base includes mission critical ecommerce websites in a wide range of business segments including financial, health, media, education and government. Their innovative systems, software and exceptional service has been leading edge for over 5 years now SOURCE: DOSarrest Internet Security Limited For further information: Brian Mohammed Director of Sales and Marketing Toll free CAN/US 888 818-1344 ext. 203 Toll Free UK 0-800-635-0551 ext. 203 Mobile: 416-434-6174 www.dosarrest.com Check out our video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUs0vWYEIkQ

View article:
DOSarrest Rolls Out New Website Monitoring Service

Week in review: Remote Linksys 0-day root exploit discovered, the Pobelka botnet, and a year of Microsoft patches

Here's an overview of some of last week's most interesting news, videos, reviews and articles: Looking back at a year of Microsoft patches Last year Microsoft's Patch Tuesdays featured a total of …

Follow this link:
Week in review: Remote Linksys 0-day root exploit discovered, the Pobelka botnet, and a year of Microsoft patches

Fox-IT analysts demystify the Pobelka botnet

Analysts from Dutch-based security audit firm Fox-IT have recently released examined in great detail a botnet that has been around for quite some time, and is still functioning and bringing money to i…

See the original article here:
Fox-IT analysts demystify the Pobelka botnet

New White House petition seeks to legitimize Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attacks

This week, a petition was filed on the White House’s “We the People” website that aims to legitimize the use of distributed denial of service attacks (DDoS) as a legitimate form of protest. “It is the equivalent of repeatedly hitting the refresh button on a webpage. It is, in that way, no different than any ‘occupy,’ protest,” the petition states. “Instead of a group of people standing outside a building to occupy the area, they are having their computer occupy a website to slow (or deny) service of that particular website for a short time. As part of this petition, those who have been jailed for DDoS should be immediately released and have anything regarding a DDoS, that is on their ‘records,’ cleared.” Some have speculated that Anonymous is behind the petition—but Anons aren’t the only one making this argument: Evgeny Morozov, a Belarus-born tech author, scholar, and journalist made a similar case back in December 2010. However, he later warned: “Declaring that DDoS is a form of civil disobedience is not the same as proclaiming that such attacks are always effective or likely to contribute to the goals of openness and transparency pursued by Anonymous and WikiLeaks. Legitimacy is not the same thing as efficacy, even though the latter can boost the former. In fact, the proliferation of DDoS may lead to a crackdown on Internet freedom, as governments seek to establish tighter control over cyberspace.” The White House’s “We the People” website opened in 2011 and allows anyone to submit a petition to the government on any topic. If a petition gets 25,000 signatures or more, the Obama Administration will be compelled to provide a formal response. Most responses have been fairly mild, however—save releasing the White House beer recipe in late 2012. Citizens have used the system to criticize its “vapid” responses, to challenge Transportation Security Administration policy, and to encourage the president to veto SOPA, among other things. Still, as of this writing, the DDoS petition only has around 1,255 signatures—23,745 to go. Source: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/01/new-white-house-petition-seeks-to-legitimize-ddos-attacks/

More here:
New White House petition seeks to legitimize Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attacks

What DDoS attacks reveal about your security infrastructure

As we close out 2012, there is no doubt that this year will go down as epic in the history books of information security professionals. Looking back on the year it’s not hard to find a laundry list of…

Follow this link:
What DDoS attacks reveal about your security infrastructure

Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attacks: 2013 Predictions

During the last third of 2012, 10 major U.S. banks were the targets of powerful distributed-denial-of-service attacks apparently launched by a foreign hacktivist group. Some observers predict there will be many more DDoS attacks against financial institutions in 2013. They say hacktivists, organized crime rings and even nation states will be the perpetrators, working collaboratively in some cases and independently in others Financial fraud expert Avivah Litan, an analyst at Gartner Research, says the attacks will continue because they work, especially for criminals. “There is no reason for the criminals to stop,” Litan says. “They are getting away with them and not getting caught. These gangs will just keep escalating the attacks, up the ante and raise the stakes on the banks. The banks will have to find and implement solutions quickly. There really is no other choice.” DDoS attacks often will be used to disguise nefarious schemes aimed at stealing intellectual property and taking over accounts, especially when the attacks are waged against smaller institutions, regulators and security experts warn. John Walker , a member of ENISA’s security experts group and chair of ISACA’s Security Advisory Group in London, says banks won’t be able to fend off all of the attacks that are coming in the new year. “What we are seeing this year is just a tip in the ocean of what is planned for 2013,” he says. To prepare for continuing DDoS attacks, banking institutions should implement incident response strategies and involve staff across multiple lines of business, as well as external partners, regulators and experts say. Banks also should consider due diligence reviews of service providers, including Internet service providers and Web-hosting companies, to ensure they, too, have taken necessary steps to identify and mitigate risks associated with DDoS attacks. PNC, Others Take Hits Since September, the hacktivist group Iz ad-Din al-Qassam Cyber Fighters has grabbed headlines for two DDoS campaigns against banks. But so far, there’s been no evidence of fraud linked to these attacks. The hacktivist group announced Dec. 25 that yet another wave of attacks was coming as part of its second campaign In the latest development, PNC Financial Services, whose customers have suffered sporadic online access issues related to high volumes of traffic during both of the DDoS campaigns, reported it experienced minor site access issues late Dec. 27. But it did not link those issues to traffic connected with a DDoS attack. PNC spokeswoman Amy Vargo says some customers reported having trouble when trying to access the bank’s site during the afternoon of Dec. 27, but “this was a very short term and intermittent issue, and the systems were quickly restored to normal.” In a Dec. 10 post on Pastebin , Iz ad-Din al-Qassam Cyber Fighters announced plans for its second campaign, targeting PNC, U.S. Bancorp, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and SunTrust Banks. Since then, the group has posted two subsequent threats and has apparently hit all five targeted institutions as well as Wells Fargo and Citibank, part of Citigroup The hacktivist group says its waging the attacks in protest of a YouTube video deemed offensive to Muslims. The first campaign of attacks, which ran from mid-September to mid-October, targeted all of the institutions hit in the second campaign, as well as Regions Bank, HSBC Holdings and Capital One. Warning to Banks Some security experts, however, are questioning whether Pastebin posts being attributed to Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Cyber Fighters actually came from that group. Anyone could take credit for the posts and the attacks, says Mike Rothman of DDoS prevention provider Securosis. “We’ll likely see lots of folks claiming responsibility for attacks and many doing it to draw attention to their causes,” Rothman says. “Is it really one group or another? Hard to truly tell, and ultimately I don’t think it matters. The attacks will keep happening, sometimes for no apparent reason. Organizations need to be ready, and that doesn’t change, regardless of the adversary.” Smaller banking institutions not targeted by Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Cyber Fighters should guard against a false sense of security, says Bill Nelson , president and CEO of the FS-ISAC. “We saw a year ago that smaller banks and regional banks were being hit [by other DDoS attackers] and many were at a loss about why,” Nelson says. Eventually, investigators confirmed attempts to commit fraud in the background of those attacks. On Dec. 21, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued an alert about the recent wave of DDoS attacks, noting that financial institutions had linked DDoS to fraud and the theft of proprietary information “These attacks by hacktivists are trying to strike terror,” Nelson says. “But cybercriminal groups have been attacking, too, off on their own launching cyberfraud. Rather than striking terror, they’re trying to make it more difficult to detect their fraud, and that’s the worry here.” Year Ahead Securosis’ Rothman says the recent waves of hacktivist attacks have drawn attention to the severity of the DDoS threat. “We have discovered a clear knowledge gap around the denial-of-service attacks in use today and the defenses needed to maintain availability,” Rothman writes in a November paper about DDoS prevention. “There is an all-too-common belief that the defenses that protect against run-of-the-mill network and application attacks will stand up to a DDoS. That’s just not the case.” Rothman says banking institutions of all sizes must start viewing DDoS attacks as instruments for multifaceted attacks. “It’s not news that some of the attackers have been using DDoS attacks to obscure ex-filtration activity,” Rothman says. “They basically work to divert the attention of the security folks with the DDoS while they steal data via other mechanisms.” Rothman says prevention steps recommended by the OCC just reiterate the obvious. “Financial institutions need to have risk management programs, and that would include tactics to mitigate against DDoS attacks as well as leveraging information-sharing networks to keep the flow of information going. If something bad happens, they need to report it and probably disclose it to customers.” Source: http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/ddos-attacks-2013-forecast-a-5396/p-2

View article:
Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attacks: 2013 Predictions

Details of the complexity of a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attacks

DDoS‘s popularity as an attack method can be explained by how important availability is to most organizations’ ability to function. Availability is as critical to an organization today as electricity. If an organization is taken offline, it can lose the ability to generate revenue from its customers, or the ability to access cloud-based data and applications. And, if publicized, the downtime can damage its reputation and brand. Arbor Networks’ data, gathered from more than 240 service provider deployments, shows that, without question, DDoS attacks are getting bigger. Much bigger. Consider the statistics: The average attack in September was 1.67 Gbps, a 72-percent growth from September 2011. The number of mid-range attacks, ranging 2-10 Gbps, also has increased, up 14.35% so far in 2012. Very large attacks, 10 Gbps+, were up 90 percent during 2011. The largest attack this year measured 100.84 Gbps. Hackers seek out pain points for an organization, like maintaining availability, and look to exploit weaknesses in infrastructure and existing security defenses. From that perspective, DDoS is a great tool. There are three main categories of DDoS attack: Volumetric attacks These attacks attempt to consume the bandwidth either within the target network/service, or between the target network/service and the rest of the internet. These attacks are simply about causing congestion. Volumetric attacks first emerged in 2001 when Microsoft, eBay and Yahoo were taken offline by what back then was considered large attacks in the 300 Mbps range – a relatively low volume attack. With DDoS attacks now exceeding 100 Gbps, internet service providers are faced with new challenges of how to protect their networks and infrastructure. TCP state-exhaustion attacks These attacks attempt to consume the connection state tables that are present in many infrastructure components, such as load balancers, firewalls and the application servers themselves. Even high-capacity devices capable of maintaining state on millions of connections can be taken down by these attacks. Application layer attacks In 2010, there was a dramatic shift in DDoS, from primarily large volumetric attacks to smaller, harder-to-detect application-layer attacks that target some aspect of an application or service at Layer 7. These are the most sophisticated, stealthy attacks, as they can be very effective with as few as one attacking machine generating a low traffic rate (this makes these attacks very difficult to proactively detect and mitigate). ** Each of these attack types present unique challenges to network operators. The easiest attacks to mitigate are volumetric, which can be effectively mitigated by cloud-based managed security services. Attacks targeting existing infrastructure, and those that are “low-and-slow” targeting applications, are the most difficult to identify and mitigate. What makes DDoS such an effective weapon in recent years is the increasing complexity of attacks, the blending of attack types, targets and techniques. Take, for example, the recent attacks on financial institutions in the United States. These attacks used a combination of attack tools with vectors mixing application-layer attacks on HTTP, HTTPS and DNS with volumetric attack traffic on a variety of protocols including TCP, UDP, ICMP and others. The other unique characteristic of these attacks was the targeting of multiple companies in the same vertical at very high bandwidth. Compromised PHP web application servers were used as bots in the attacks. Additionally, many WordPress sites, often using the out-of-date TimThumb plug-in, were compromised around the same time. Joomla and other PHP-based applications were also leveraged. The attackers uploaded PHP WebShells to unmaintained servers and then used those shells to further deploy attack tools. The attackers connected to the tools either directly or through intermediate servers/proxies/scripts, and therefore the concept of command-and-control did not apply in the usual manner. This complex, rapidly evolving attack vector requires purpose-built tools, both on-premise and cloud-based, to provide comprehensive protection against both large attacks and those that target the application layer. And until we see pervasive deployment of best practices defenses, we can expect to see DDoS in the headlines for years to come. Winston Churchill offered some great advice that IT security professionals should keep top of mind as they adapt their defense to the threat landscape, “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: It is the courage to continue that counts.” Source: http://www.scmagazine.com/its-the-complexity-not-the-size-that-makes-ddos-effective/article/273775/

Visit link:
Details of the complexity of a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attacks

Mobile malware, botnets and attacks on the cloud to rise

ESET has published its annual review of the past year's threat trends and compiled predictions for 2013. According to the new report, the 2013 threatscape will see major growth of mobile malware and i…

Follow this link:
Mobile malware, botnets and attacks on the cloud to rise