Category Archives: DDoS News

Tactics of an SQL Injection Attack

Over the last few months, I’ve started to see a common refrain from new customers coming onboard, indicating that they were getting DDOS’d with an SQL injection and needed protection. Each of these customers would describe different circumstances and impact to their websites, and the only similarity was that they all had backend databases to their websites. It made me take a deeper look into the attacks targeting some of these customers, to see if there was more to SQL injection than what the current understanding indicates. Here’s what I discovered as the most common methods for attacking a website database a)     Crafted Code Injection – this technique falls within the conventional understanding, where an attacker will inject SQL statements via user input, cookies or server variables, in an attempt to have the rogue command passed to the backend database. If the database is not secured properly, the command may get successfully executed and lead to devastating results (eg. Dump of the database, data corruption, shutdown, etc.) b)     Resource Exhaustion –arguments and commands are passed at a high enough frequency to simply overwhelm the database so it cannot process legitimate transactions. The illegitimate arguments that are being passed may be invalid or just nonsensical, and therefore not executed upon, but they still require the database to review the input before discarding. By injecting a flood of these types of requests, the CPU load of the backend database starts to increase to the point it stops responding. What we’ve seen with the Resource Exhaustion style attacks is that it often doesn’t take much in terms of packets or bits per second to make some of these database servers keel over. For those of you familiar with UDP/ICMP/SYN floods, which can be 10+ Gb/s and millions of packets per second (pps), you’ll be surprised to hear that Resource Exhaustion SQL Injections can be small as 200 kb/s as well as being only a few hundred pps, to debilitate a database and effectively bring a site down. Regardless of what attack technique is employed, we here at DOSarrest have been able to keep customers databases operational and intact under our protection.  With our ability to mitigate these types of incursions, by employing features such as: i)                   Managing Arguments – checking and sanitizing which arguments get passed through to our customer ii)                 User Agent Verification – validation of http header fields to ensure that request are coming from an accepted list of browsers iii)               Client Validation – proprietary algorithm ensuring that a visitor to a site is in fact a real user session iv)                Connection Rate Limiting – discarding connections from sources that trip custom defined thresholds as well as many more, we are able to provide solutions unique to each customers setup and requirements. While we have been extremely successful in helping out our customers during these attacks, we still advise our customers to take preventative measures and use best case practices in designing their website code. In the next article, our Security Operations Manager, Sean Power, will be providing some useful tips and tricks in designing secure connections from your website to your backend database Jag Bains CTO DOSarrest Internet Security

Original post:
Tactics of an SQL Injection Attack

Millions of GoDaddy sites go offline due to alleged DDoS attack

GoDaddy, on of the biggest and most popular Internet domain registrars and web hosting companies in the world, has suffered an outage on Monday that left many of its customers' websites temporarily av…

Read the original:
Millions of GoDaddy sites go offline due to alleged DDoS attack

Arizona man sentenced for Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack

A man who was reportedly part of one of the first “DDOS-for-hire” electronic attack hit squads will serve two-and-a-half years in prison for selling access to malware-infected computers. Joshua Schichtel, 30, of Phoenix, AZ, was sentenced on Sept. 6 to 30 months in prison for selling command-and-control access to, and use of, thousands of malware-infected computers, announced Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Ronald Machen, Jr. Schichtel was also ordered to serve three years of supervised release. Schichtel pleaded ea on August 17, 2011, to one count of attempting to cause damage to multiple computers without authorization by the transmission of programs, codes or commands, a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Schichtel was allegedly part of one of the first “DDOS-for-hire” rings uncovered in 2004. He was caught up in an investigation into a Massachusetts businessman’s scheme to launch an organized Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) attack on his competitors by hiring hackers who knew how to perform the electronic assaults. According to court documents, Schichtel sold access to “botnets,” which are networks of computers that have been infected with a malicious computer program that allows unauthorized users to control infected computers. Individuals who wanted to infect computers with various different types of malicious software (malware) would contact Schichtel and pay him to install, or have installed, malware on the computers that comprised those botnets. Specifically, said the documents, Schichtel pleaded guilty to causing software to be installed on approximately 72,000 computers on behalf of a customer who paid him $1,500 for use of the botnet.

Visit site:
Arizona man sentenced for Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack

Arizona man goes to prison for selling access to botnets

Joshua Schichtel was sentenced to 30 months in prison for selling command-and-control access to and use of thousands of malware-infected computers. In addition to his prison term, Schichtel was ordere…

Originally posted here:
Arizona man goes to prison for selling access to botnets

Anonymous Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ Attacks Take Down 3 UK Sites

The hacktivist group Anonymous staged a number of DDoS attacks on UK government websites yesterday in an apparent show of support for the controversial WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who remains stuck inside his Ecuadorean embassy bolt-hole as he attempts to avoid extradition to Sweden. Anonymous, who have been associated with numerous distributed denial of service attacks in the past, yesterday claimed to have taken down a number of high profile government sites in the UK, including the Justice Department website and “Number 10”, the official website of Britain’s prime minister. In addition, it’s believed that the hacktivist collective was also responsible for taking down the UK’s Department of Work and Pensions website on the same day. The group later claimed through its @AnonIRC Twitter that the attacks were part of “#OpFreeAssange, in reference to the WiliLeaks founder that they have long supported. The Ministry of Justice later confirmed the attack in the following statement: “The Ministry of Justice website was the subject of an online attack last night at around 2000 hours. This is a public information website and no sensitive data is held on it. No other Ministry of Justice systems have been affected. Measures put in place to keep the website running mean that some visitors may be unable to access the site intermittently. We will continue to monitor the situation and will take measures accordingly.” As of this morning, it appears that the Department of Work and Pensions site is now running normally, but the Ministry of Justice said that it’s still experiencing some problems with its website, and that it cannot give a time frame for when the problems might be solved. Number10.gov.uk also remains down, with no word from the government as to when it might be back. Source: http://siliconangle.com/blog/2012/08/21/opfreeassange-anonymous-ddos-attacks-take-down-3-uk-sites/

Read the original:
Anonymous Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ Attacks Take Down 3 UK Sites

DDoS protection service: Top vendors in the field

Distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks have in the past been viewed mostly as a tool of online protest due to Anonymous' obvious predilection for this service disruption technique, but have long…

View original post here:
DDoS protection service: Top vendors in the field

Bambuser Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack may be connected with Assange embassy stream

Bambuser came under a distributed denial-of-service attack on Thursday morning, possibly in connection with a user’s coverage of the Ecuadorian embassy where Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is holed up. The connection is not certain, but Bambuser’s Swedish proprietors say they had received threatening tweets just prior to the attack. Bambuser chief Jonas Vig told ZDNet that the DDoS took the service down for “almost an hour” and made it “hard to reach for another hour”. Bambuser lets people stream live video from their smartphones to the web. It has become very popular with activists and protestors, from the Occupy movement to Russia and Syria. The service has come under attack before, with the attacks generally coinciding with marches and protests that are being covered on Bambuser. The stream that appears to have solicited the DDoS is that of ‘citizen journalist’ James Albury, who has stationed himself outside the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Julian Assange has been inside the embassy since June, and the Ecuadorian government is set to announce its decision regarding his asylum bid later on Thursday. A diplomatic row erupted overnight, after Ecuador accused UK authorities of preparing to storm the embassy. Assange is wanted for questioning in Sweden over sexual coercion and rape allegations, and the UK wants to extradite him there under a European Arrest Warrant. Vig explained that the tweets Bambuser had received were not of the ‘tango down’ variety, but they did indicate that “it was someone aiming the attack directly at some specific users of ours”. “We still don’t want to speculate who was behind it, but there’s some indication it was directly aimed at blocking the streams from the embassy,” he added. “It was quite a serious attack,” Vig said. “We consider all DDoSes as serious.” A new anti-Wikileaks hacker, or group of hackers, called Antileaks has suggested on Twitter that he, she or they might be responsible for the DDoS. For fast DDoS protection against your e-commerce website click here . Source:

View the original here:
Bambuser Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack may be connected with Assange embassy stream

Critical vulnerabilities in popular DDoS toolkit exposed

Prolexic Technologies exposed weaknesses in the command and control (C&C) architecture of the Dirt Jumper DDoS Toolkit family that could neutralize would-be attackers. The Dirt Jumper family of toolki…

Excerpt from:
Critical vulnerabilities in popular DDoS toolkit exposed

Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ crooks: Do you want us to blitz those phone lines too TDoS?

Cybercrooks are now offering to launch cyberattacks against telecom services, with prices starting at just $20 a day. Distributed denial of attacks against websites or web services have been going on for many years. Attacks that swamped telecoms services are a much more recent innovation, first starting around 2010. While DDoS attacks on websites are typically launched from botnets (networks of compromised Windows PCs under the control of hackers), attacks on telecom lines are launched using attack scripts on compromised Asterisk (software PBX) server. Default credentials are one of the main security weaknesses used by hackers to initially gain access to a VoIP/PBX systems prior to launching voice mail phishing scams or running SIP-based flooding attacks, say researchers. Telecoms-focused denial of service attacks are motivated by the same sorts of motives as a DDoS on a website. “Typical motives can be anything from revenge, extortion, political/ideological, and distraction from a larger set of financial crimes,” a blog post by Curt Wilson of DDoS mitigation experts Arbor Networks explains. Many of the cybercrime techniques first seen while crooks blitzed websites with junk traffic are being reapplied in the arena of flooding phone lines as a prelude to secondary crimes, according to Arbor. “Just as we’ve seen the Dirt Jumper bot used to create distractions – by launching DDoS attacks upon financial institutions and financial infrastructure at the same time that fraud is taking place (with the Zeus Trojan, or other banking malware or other attack technique) – DDoS aimed at telecommunications is being used to create distractions that allow other crimes to go unnoticed for a longer period.” Arbor details an array of services offered by hackers, some of which offer to flood telephones (both mobile and fixed line) for $20 per day. The more cost-conscious would-be crooks can shop around for a service that offers to blitz lines for $5 an hour, the price offered in another ad spotted by the ASERT security research team. As well as blitzing phone lines, other attacks against a targeted organisation’s VoIP system or SIP controllers are possible. Poorly configured VoIP systems can be brought down even by something as simple as a port scan, Wilson notes. “In such cases, an attacker could bring down an organisations’ phone system quickly if they were able to reach the controller. The benefits of proactive security testing can help identify such brittle systems ahead of time, before an attacker might latch onto the vulnerability. “Any system is subject to availability attacks at any point where an application layer or other processor-intensive operation exists as well as the networks that supply these systems via link saturation and state-table exhaustion. Telecommunications systems are no exception to this principle, as we have seen. Clearly, there is money to be made in the underground economy or these services would not be advertised,” Wilson concludes. For fast protection against your e-commerce website click here . Source: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/08/02/telecoms_ddos/

Visit link:
Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ crooks: Do you want us to blitz those phone lines too TDoS?

Tablet’s Server Outages due to Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack

For the last several months, Tablet Magazine’s servers have been coming under recurring distributed denial-of-service attacks, or DDoS attacks . Yesterday we suffered two major attacks, the first around 1:30 p.m., shortly after we posted Michael C. Moynihan’s explosive article about the further dishonesty of Jonah Lehrer, the author and New Yorker writer. The Lehrer story brought us an unprecedentedly large legitimate traffic load. Some commentators and observers speculated that that’s what brought us down. It’s true that the rush of readers coming to the Lehrer story was much larger than normal, but I am assured by our IT team that we had more than sufficient bandwith and server memory to handle it. Notably, for several midafternoon hours, when we were not under attack, we served extraordinarily high traffic loads uneventfully. Our IT team strongly believes that what we were experiencing—and have been for some time—are sophisticated attacks specifically targeting Tablet, not just run-of-the-mill Internet-as-Wild-West hijinks. It is possible that whoever is out to get us seized on a moment when we had high publicity and high server demand to attack. It sounds a little paranoid, granted, but as the saying goes, just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you. The romantic in me hopes it’s the Iranians. Meantime, we’re doing what we can to keep the site up, and we apologize for our no-doubt maddening unreliability. And if you’re a DDoS-mitigation expert who’s eager for some pro-bono work, you know where to find us. Source: http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/107948/on-tablet%E2%80%99s-server-outages

Follow this link:
Tablet’s Server Outages due to Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack