Tag Archives: ddos

Jurassic DDoS?

Like something from the digital ice age, distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks have thawed and are roaming the cyber planet again, according to data from Google in collaboration with Arbor Networks, which provides insight into the scale and geography of recent cyber strikes. Various other reports support the same theory. Verisign estimates that a third of downtime incidents stem from DDoS attacks. These attacks are costly for both businesses and consumers, and the costs are rising. The security firm Prolexic found that attacks became bigger and more frequent in 2013 vs. 2012. There was a 58% increase in total DDoS attacks; 101% increase in application layer (Layer 7) attacks; 48% increase in infrastructure (Layer 3 &4); and 12.4% increase in average attack duration. In addition to an increase in frequency and scale, Prolexic observed some interesting metrics that illustrate significant changes in DDoS attack methodologies. Most notably was a shift away from the bulky flat packet SYN floods to UDP-based attacks and the rapid adoption of Distributed Reflection Denial-of-Service (DrDoS) attacks. A “reflection attack” is a compromise of a server’s security caused by tricking it into giving up an authentication security code, allowing a hacker to access it. These attacks are made possible when servers use a simple protocol to authenticate visitors. It exploits a common security technique known as a challenge-response authentication, which relies on the exchange of secure information between authorized user and server. The hacker logs on and receives a challenge. The server is expecting an answer in the form of the correct response but instead, the hacker creates another connection and sends the challenge back to the server. In a weak protocol, the server will send back the answer, allowing the hacker to send the answer back along the original connection to access the server. Systems that use a challenge-response authentication approach to security can be vulnerable to reflection attacks unless they are modified to address the most common security holes. Reflection attacks use a different kind of bot and require a different type of server to spoof the target IP. Prolexic believes the adoption of DrDoS attacks is likely to continue, as fewer bots are required to generate a high volume of attack traffic due to reflection and amplification techniques. Such attacks also provide anonymity by spoofing IP addresses. Another interesting observation by Prolexic is that infrastructure-based attack protocols such as SYN floods remain in steady use and are often implemented in conjunction with the reflection attacks. The US and China are popular targets simply because these two countries have more internet users than any other country, and both countries are popular choices for ideologically based attacks. The top ten DDoS originating countries according to the Prolexic Quarterly Global DDoS Attack Report Q3 2013 are: China – 62% United States – 9.06% Republic of Korea – 7.09% Brazil – 4.46% Russia – 4.45% India – 3.45% Taiwan – 2.95% Poland – 2.23% Japan – 2.11% Italy – 1.94% So, what does the future hold for DDoS attacks? Future DDoS attacks will likely be conducted through the use of booter scripts, stressor services, and related Application Programming Interfaces (API). The increasing use of this attack method will result in much more effective attacks with fewer resources required. Since these attacks are easier to employ, DrDoS attacks will become more popular. In fact, according to Prolexic, script kiddies are graduating into digital crime and assembling DDoS-for-hire sites for as little as five dollars ($5). That $5 can buy you 600 seconds of DDoS and just $50 could put a credit union down for an afternoon. Remember, it costs far less to generate an attack than to mitigate an attack. Security professionals must promote cleanup efforts and make it difficult for hackers to send money to criminals offering DDoS for hire. The financial institutions with smaller security budgets become more lucrative targets because they cannot apply the resources to identify threats. Verizon’s Chris Novak agreed: “We are seeing where DDoS is used to distract a medium-size financial institution. While they are busy fighting off the DDoS, they don’t see that terabytes of data just walked out the door. That’s scary.” DDoS is not dead. In fact, it is alive and kicking. In addition to the foray of targets, many new government programs have become recent hacker targets using DDoS. As new software is developed, it is incumbent on IT security professionals to be cognizant of potential DDoS vulnerabilities and to initiate countermeasures as quickly as possible. Source: http://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/blog/2013/11/5/jurassic-ddos/1050.aspx

Read the original:
Jurassic DDoS?

Extra Life DDoS Attack: Children’s Charity Extra Life Website Hit By DDoS During Annual Gaming Marathon

Extra Life — a charity organization dedicated helping Children’s Miracle Network Hospitals through an annual gaming marathon — has been hit with a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack. According to Escapist Magazine, Extra Life raises money for Children’s Miracle Network Hospitals by taking pledges and then playing games — anything from video games to board games and tabletop miniatures — for 25 hours straight. Extra Life was in the middle of this year’s event, which began at 8 a.m. today and ends at 8 a.m. on November 3, when their website suddenly went down. As a result, pledges could not be taken. News of the DDoS attack was confirmed with a statement on the Extra Life Facebook page by founder Jeromy “Doc” Adams: “We’ve discovered that the Extra Life website experienced a DDoS attack against our datacenter,” the statement reads. “I am not sure what kind of person would DDoS a charitable initiative. I am so sorry that you are going through this frustration today. Our entire team is purely heartbroken that someone would do this. But it has happened. As frustrating as this is for everyone involved, it pales in comparison to what the kids we’re trying to save go through. That reality, for me personally, is about the only thing keeping me somewhat calm right now. “I am very angry and very sorry,” the statement continues. “You deserve better than this. The kids deserve better than this. Extra Life has given a lot of us some of the happiest moments in our lives. This is not one of those moments. Please hang with us through this. It is important that we spread the word. Please get on every form of social media you can and tell your friends what happened. We can overcome this together.” After a few of hours of downtime, the Extra Life website was back online.   Many took to Facebook to vent their outrage that hackers would choose to DDoS a charity organization. “I understand DDoS’ing a website of a corrupt business or government, but…Why would someone DDoS this?” one user wrote. “May whoever did this lose their shoes and have every child in their neighborhood strew Legos in their path forever,” another user commented. A DDoS attack takes place when hackers use an army of infected computers to send traffic to a server, causing a shutdown in the process. Source: http://www.ibtimes.com/extra-life-ddos-attack-childrens-charity-extra-life-website-hit-ddos-during-annual-gaming-marathon

Originally posted here:
Extra Life DDoS Attack: Children’s Charity Extra Life Website Hit By DDoS During Annual Gaming Marathon

Application-layer DDoS attacks are becoming increasingly sophisticated

The number of DDoS (distributed denial-of-service) attacks that target weak spots in Web applications in addition to network services has risen during the past year and attackers are using increasingly sophisticated methods to bypass defenses, according to DDoS mitigation experts. Researchers from Incapsula, a company that provides website security and DDoS protection services, recently mitigated a highly adaptive DDoS attack against one of its customers that went on for weeks and combined network-layer with application-layer—Layer 7—attack techniques. The target was a popular trading site that belongs to a prominent player in a highly competitive online industry and it was one of the most complex DDoS attacks Incapsula has ever had to deal with, the company’s researchers said in a blog post. The attack started soon after an ex-partner left the targeted company and the attackers appeared to have intimate knowledge of the weak spots in the target’s infrastructure, suggesting that the two events might be connected, the researchers said. The attack began with volumetric SYN floods designed to consume the target’s bandwidth. It then progressed with HTTP floods against resource intensive pages, against special AJAX objects that supported some of the site’s functions and against Incapsula’s own resources. The attackers then switched to using DDoS bots capable of storing session cookies in an attempt to bypass a mitigation technique that uses cookie tests to determine if requests come from real browsers. The ability to store cookies is usually a feature found in full-fledged browsers, not DDoS tools. As Incapsula kept blocking the different attack methods, the attackers kept adapting and eventually they started flooding the website with requests sent by real browsers running on malware-infected computers. “It looked like an abnormally high spike in human traffic,” the Incapsula researchers said. “Still, even if the volumes and behavioral patterns were all wrong, every test we performed showed that these were real human visitors.” This real-browser attack was being launched from 20,000 computers infected with a variant of the PushDo malware, Incapsula later discovered. However, when the attack first started, the company had to temporarily use a last-resort mitigation technique that involved serving CAPTCHA challenges to users who matched a particular configuration. The company learned that a PushDo variant capable of opening hidden browser instances on infected computers was behind the attack after a bug in the malware caused the rogue browser windows to be displayed on some computers. This led to users noticing Incapsula’s block pages in those browsers and reaching out to the company with questions. “This is the first time we’ve seen this technique used in a DDoS attack,” said Marc Gaffan, co-founder of Incapsula. The challenge with application-layer attacks is to distinguish human traffic from bot traffic, so DDoS mitigation providers often use browser fingerprinting techniques like cookie tests and JavaScript tests to determine if requests actually come from real browsers. Launching DDoS attacks from hidden, but real browser instances running on infected computers makes this type of detection very hard. “We’ve been seeing more and more usage of application-layer attacks during the last year,” Gaffan said, adding that evasion techniques are also adopted rapidly. “There’s an ecosystem behind cybercrime tools and we predict that this method, which is new today, will become mainstream several months down the road,” he said. DDoS experts from Arbor Networks, another DDoS mitigation vendor, agree that there has been a rise in both the number and sophistication of Layer 7 attacks. There have been some papers released this year about advanced Layer 7 attack techniques that can bypass DDoS mitigation capabilities and the bad guys are now catching on to them, said Marc Eisenbarth, manager of research for Arbor’s Security Engineering and Response Team. There’s general chatter among attackers about bypassing detection and they’re doing this by using headless browsers—browser toolkits that don’t have a user interface—or by opening hidden browser instances, Eisenbarth said. In addition, all malware that has man-in-the-browser functionality and is capable of injecting requests into existing browsing sessions can also be used for DDoS, he said. Layer 7 attacks have become more targeted in nature with attackers routinely performing reconnaissance to find the weak spots in the applications they plan to attack. These weak spots can be resource-intensive libraries or scripts that result in a lot of database queries. This behavior was observed during the attacks against U.S. banking websites a year ago when attackers decided to target the log-in services of those websites because they realized they could cause significant problems if users are prevented from logging in, Eisenbarth said. “We continued to see attackers launch those type of attacks and perform reconnaissance to find URLs that, when requested, may result in a lot of resource activity on the back end,” he said. More and more companies are putting together DDoS protection strategies, but they are more focused on network-layer attacks, Gaffan said. They look at things like redundancy or how much traffic their DDoS mitigation solution can take, but they should also consider whether they can resist application-layer attacks because these can be harder to defend against than volumetric attacks, he said. With application-layer attacks there’s an ongoing race between the bad guys coming up with evasion techniques and DDoS mitigation vendors or the targeted companies coming up with remedies until the next round, Gaffan said. Because of that, both companies and DDoS mitigation providers need to have a very dynamic strategy in place, he said. “I think we will continue to see an evolution in the sophistication of application-layer attacks and we will see more and more of them,” Gaffan said. They won’t replace network-layer attacks, but will be used in combination with them, he said. Having Layer 7 visibility is very important and companies should consider technologies that can provide that, Eisenbarth said. In addition to that, they should perform security audits and performance tests for their Web applications to see what kind of damage an attacker could do to them, he said. Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2056805/applicationlayer-ddos-attacks-are-becoming-increasingly-sophisticated.html

Link:
Application-layer DDoS attacks are becoming increasingly sophisticated

OpThrowback: Anonymous to Launch DDOS Attacks Against FBI, NSA.

  Anonymous hackers, more precisely the ones who hacked a couple of Syrian government websites last week, have announced the start of a new campaign called Operation Throwback. ~ SoftPedia The goal of the operation is “to strike back against the oppressors of our freedom.” The hackers say they will launch distributed denial-of-service (DDOS) attacks against several high-profile websites. Today, on October 28, they plan on launching a cyberattack against the main website of T-Mobile. On October 31, they plan on attacking the website of the FBI, the NSA, Verizon, Microsoft and AT&T. The hacktivists urge their supporters to download DDOS tools and VPNs. The initiators of the operation are providing download links and instructions on how to use them. Earlier today, the hackers tested their “firepower” against the official website of the American Nazi Party. At the time of publishing NCB Interpol web site was down, apparantly from Ddos attack. Source: http://revolution-news.com/opthrowback-anonymous-to-launch-ddos-attacks-against-fbi-nsa/

View original post here:
OpThrowback: Anonymous to Launch DDOS Attacks Against FBI, NSA.

Visual investigations of botnet command and control behavior

One of the classic debates in computer science concerns whether artificial intelligence or virtual reality is the more worthwhile pursuit. The advocates of artificial intelligence argue that computers…

See the original post:
Visual investigations of botnet command and control behavior

12 year old Quebec boy Anonymous Hacker Pleads Guilty to DDOS Attack on Government Websites

A 12-year-old Quebec boy is responsible for hacking several government and police websites during the student uprising in spring 2012, creating computer havoc and causing $60,000 damage, court heard Thursday. Some sites were out of service for up to two days and the boy did it in the name of the activist/hacktivist group Anonymous. The Grade 5 student from the Montreal suburb of Notre-Dame- de-Grâce, whose actions were not politically motivated, traded pirated information to Anonymous for video games, court was told. The boy appeared in youth court Thursday dressed in his school uniform and accompanied by his father. He pleaded guilty to three charges related to the hacking of the websites, including those of Montreal police, the Quebec Institute of Public Health, Chilean government and some non-public sites. Police estimate damage to the sites at $60,000 but a more detailed report will be produced in court when the boy is sentenced next month. The little hacker, whose name can’t be published and is said to have been involved with computers since the age of nine, contributed to the crash of some sites and accessed information belonging to users and administrators. He had even issued a warning to others: “It’s easy to hack but do not go there too much, they will track you down.” Court heard the boy used three different computer attacks, one which resulted in a denial of service to those trying to access the websites and flooded servers, making them ineffective. In another method he would alter information and make it appear as the homepage. His third tactic involved exploiting security holes in order to access database servers. “And he told others how to do it,” a police expert testified in Montreal on Thursday. While others were arrested in the scheme, it was the boy who opened the door to the website attacks, court heard. “He saw it as a challenge, he was only 12 years old,” his lawyer said. “There was no political purpose.” In 2000, a 15-year-old Montreal boy, know as Mafiaboy, did an estimated $1.7 billion in damage through hacking. He was sentenced to eight months in youth detention and subsequently received several job offers in cybersecurity. Source: http://www.torontosun.com/2013/10/25/que-boy-12-pleads-guilty-to-hacking-government-websites

Read More:
12 year old Quebec boy Anonymous Hacker Pleads Guilty to DDOS Attack on Government Websites

NSA site down due to alleged DDoS attack

The website for the United States National Security Agency suddenly went offline Friday. NSA.gov has been unavailable globally as of late Friday afternoon, and Twitter accounts belonging to people loosely affiliated with the Anonymous hacktivism movement have suggested they are responsible. Twitter users @AnonymousOwn3r and @TruthIzSexy both were quick to comment on the matter, and implied that a distributed denial-of-service attack, or DDoS, may have been waged as an act of protest against the NSA   Allegations that those users participated in the DDoS — a method of over-loading a website with too much traffic — are currently unverified, and @AnonymousOwn3r has previously taken credit for downing websites in a similar fashion, although those claims have been largely contested. The crippling of NSA.gov comes amid a series of damning national security documents that have been disclosed without authorization by former intelligence contractor Edward Snowden. The revelations in the leaked documents have impassioned people around the globe outraged by evidence of widespread surveillance operated by the NSA, and a massive “Stop Watching Us” rally is scheduled for Saturday in Washington, DC. DDoS attacks are illegal in the United States under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, or CFAA, and two cases are currently underway in California and Virginia in which federal judges are weighing in on instances in which members of Anonymous allegedly used the technique to take down an array of sites during anti-copyright campaigns waged by the group in 2010 and 2011. In those cases, so-called hacktivsits are reported to have conspired together to send immense loads of traffic to targeted websites, rendering them inaccessible due to the overload.

More:
NSA site down due to alleged DDoS attack

A DDoS Attack Could Cost $1 Million Before Mitigation Even Starts

A new report suggests that companies are unaware of the extent of the DDoS threat, unaware of the potential cost of an attack, and over-reliant on traditional and inadequate in-house defenses. Marking its inaugural International DDoS Awareness Day, Neustar has released new research into business awareness of contemporary denial-of-service attacks. IDG Research Services questioned more than 200 IT managers for companies with an online marketing or commercial web presence; 70% of which were involved in e-commerce operations. The study finds that it takes an average of ten hours before a company can even begin to resolve a DDoS attack. On average, a DDoS attack isn’t detected until 4.5 hours after its commencement; and a further 4.9 hours passes before mitigation can commence. With outage costs averaging $100,000 per hour, it means that a DDoS attack can cost an internet-reliant company $1 million before the company even starts to mitigate the attack. With the year’s peak shopping period fast approaching, it is something that cannot be ignored. “If an attack results in an outage lasting days, the economic results could be catastrophic. To some companies, it could even be fatal,” warns Neustar. One problem, suggests Susan Warner, Neustar’s market manager for DDoS solutions, is that IT administrators may not be fully aware of the business implications of downtime. “For example,” she says, “an administrator may believe that if the system goes down for a few hours it’s not a big deal, but may not realize there is going to be hundreds of thousand of dollars of marketing spend lost for every hour of site downtime.” A second problem is either a misunderstanding of the nature of modern attacks, or a basic belief that DDoS attacks will always go after someone else. Most companies rely on in-house technology to defend against attacks: 77% have firewalls, 65% have routers and switches, and 59% have intrusion detection. But only 26% use cloud-based mitigation services. Nevertheless, there is a strong belief among these IT managers that they are adequately protected: 86% of the respondents are either somewhat, very or extremely confident in their defenses. But new DDoS techniques such as DNS amplification/reflection, warns Neustar, “can easily overwhelm on-premise defenses and even congest the presumably vaster resources of an ISP.” In fact, in the face of a major attack, in-house defenses can make matters worse. A lot of enterprises, warns Warner, “believe they have some technology already in place that will help them, such as a firewall or a router that can handle some extra traffic, but a high-volume DDoS attack is going to quickly overwhelm those traditional types of defenses and they will rapidly become part of the bottleneck.” “Responding to this new reality,” says the report, “requires actionable continuous monitoring and analysis against realtime threat intelligence, and constantly evolving incident management scenarios.” The answer lies in the cloud. “Cloud-based mitigation is achieved either by redirecting your traffic during an assault or having it always go through a cloud service,” says Warner. “An always-on type of approach can also be achieved through a hybrid solution that provides mitigation resources on-site; if they begin to be overwhelmed, a failover to a cloud service is immediately activated.” Source: http://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/view/35238/a-ddos-attack-could-cost-1-million-before-mitigation-even-starts

View article:
A DDoS Attack Could Cost $1 Million Before Mitigation Even Starts

Attackers use smaller botnets to launch high-bandwidth attacks

DDoS perpetrators changed tactics in Q3 2013 to boost attack sizes and hide their identities, according to Prolexic. “This quarter, the major concern is that reflection attacks are accelerating d…

Link:
Attackers use smaller botnets to launch high-bandwidth attacks