Tag Archives: rights

RBS hit by DDoS attack that takes down online services again

UK BANKING GROUP Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) has been hit by a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack that took down its online services for the second time this week. Earlier this week, RBS irked customers when an IT systems failure shut down its websites and caused its customers’ bank cards to fail. On Friday it admitted that it has been struck by a DDoS attack affecting its online services once again. RBS took to Twitter to reveal news of the DDoS attack. It said, “Due to a surge in internet traffic directed at the Natwest website, customers experienced difficulties accessing some of our sites today. “This deliberate surge of traffic is known as a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack. We have taken action to restore affected sites. “At no time was there any risk to customers. We apologise for the inconvenience caused.” RBS has yet to comment further, so it’s still unclear which websites were downed in the attack, although the tweet suggested that the RBS, Natwest and Ulster Bank websites were all affected. It is also still unclear who was responsible for the DDoS attack. However, it seems that the problems have not reached as far as those experienced by RBS customers earlier this week, when an IT systems failure struck the entire banking group. Speaking about the system failure on Monday evening, RBS CEO Ross McEwan said on Tuesday, “Last night’s systems failure was unacceptable. Yesterday was a busy shopping day and far too many of our customers were let down, unable to make purchases and withdraw cash. “For decades, RBS failed to invest properly in its systems. We need to put our customers’ needs at the centre of all we do. It will take time, but we are investing heavily in building IT systems our customers can rely on. “I’m sorry for the inconvenience we caused our customers. We know we have to do better. I will be outlining plans in the New Year for making RBS the bank that our customers and the UK need it to be. This will include an outline of where we intend to invest for the future.” Source: http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2317692/rbs-hit-by-ddos-attack-that-takes-down-online-services-again

View article:
RBS hit by DDoS attack that takes down online services again

PayPal 14 plea deal a win for DDoS as civil disobedience

Eleven of the fourteen defendants in the PayPal 14 case have reached a plea deal with federal prosecutors. Under the agreement, the defendants will plead guilty to felonies and misdemeanors under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). If they observe good behavior, federal prosecutors will ask that the felonies be dropped. This comes as good news to those who advance the notion that DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attacks are acts of civil disobedience. Two other defendants will serve 90 days in prison after pleading guilty to a misdemeanor charge pled guilty to a misdemeanor, while the last of the fourteen defendants was not eligible for a plea deal in the case. The PayPal 14 are only a small fraction of the over 1,000 participants identified in a DDoS attack aimed at PayPal, which Anonymous hit as part of “Operation Payback” after the company cut service to WikiLeaks’s donations page. Pierre Omidyar, founder of eBay, which is the parent company of PayPal, called for leniency. Ironic given that PayPal provided the Department of Justice with a list of the participants’ IP addresses, which helped the FBI locate the protesters. “I can understand that the protesters were upset by PayPal’s actions and felt that they were simply participating in an online demonstration of their frustration. That is their right, and I support freedom of expression, even when it’s my own company that is the target,” Omidyar wrote two days ago in a Huffington Post op-ed. “The problem in this case however is that the tools being distributed by Anonymous are extremely powerful. They turn over control of a protester’s computer to a central controller which can order it to make many hundreds of web page requests per second to a target website.” DDoS works by connecting thousands of computers together to bombard websites with traffic until it collapses. As Omidyar noted, it multiplies the power of a single protester, which is something that cannot be done in the physical realm without significant grassroots effort. Nevertheless, the plea deal is significant because it sets a legal precedent that DDoS isn’t just some effort to cause significant financial harm. While the plea deal doesn’t define DDoS as digital protest, it might be the first step in acknowledging the attack as something akin to protesters blocking a road or a business. These physical protests are typically prosecuted as misdemeanors, not felonies that can bring hefty prison terms, high restitution costs, and a lifetime designation as a felon. The PayPal 14 plea deal might also help begin the very necessary process of amending the CFAA, which allows stiff penalties for these non-violent crimes in the first place. Shortly before the news was announced, activist lawyer Stanley Cohen tweeted: “Stay tuned for details. Pay Pal 14 will be resolved today, big win for civil disobedience. Up the Rebels.” And a good win for the internet, which is coming of age as the supreme venue for protest against political and financial power. Source: http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/210854/paypal-14-plea-deal-a-win-for-ddos-as-civil-disobedience/

Bitcoin Password Grab Disguised As DDoS Attack

Attacks against bitcoin users continue, as online forum Bitcointalk.org warns users their passwords might have been stolen in distributed denial of service hack. Aficionados of the cryptographic currency known as Bitcoin might have gotten more than they bargained for recently, after a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack appeared to be used as a smokescreen for launching a password-stealing attack against users of Bitcointalk.org. Michael Marquardt (a.k.a. “Theymos”), one of the administrators of the popular bitcoin discussion forum, Sunday warned its 176,584 members of the attack. He said the attack had been traced to a flaw in the systems of domain registration firm AnonymousSpeech, which specializes in anonymous email, as well as running hosting servers outside the United States and the European Union. Attackers hacked AnonymousSpeech to change the bitcoin discussion forum’s DNS settings to an attacker-controlled server. According to Marquardt, the DNS redirection attack was spotted Sunday by forum manager Malmi Martti (a.k.a. Sirius), who immediately moved the domain to a different registrar. “However, such changes take about 24 hours to propagate,” he warned, meaning that users remained at risk unless they logged on to the forum using its IP address, rather than trusting domain name servers to resolve to the non-malicious site. What was the risk to forum users? “Because the HTTPS protocol is pretty terrible, this alone could have allowed the attacker to intercept and modify encrypted forum transmissions, allowing them to see passwords sent during login, authentication cookies, [personal messages], etc.,” Marquardt said. “Your password only could have been intercepted if you actually entered it while the forum was affected. I invalidated all security codes, so you’re not at risk of having your account stolen if you logged in using the ‘remember me’ feature without actually entering your password.” In other words, anyone who logged into the forum between Sunday and Monday, and who entered a password, should assume that it was compromised by attackers. What were the bitcoin forum attackers gunning for? The most likely explanation would be participants’ usernames and passwords, which — if reused on other sites — might have allowed attackers to drain people’s online bitcoin wallets. Likewise, attackers might have been interested in gathering email addresses of people who are interested in bitcoins to target them — via phishing attacks — with malware designed to find and steal bitcoins from their PCs. The DNS hack and DDoS attack against Bitcointalk are just the latest exploits in a long string of attacks targeting bitcoin e-wallet services and payment systems. Last month, Denmark-based bitcoin payment processor Bitcoin Internet Payment System suffered a DDoS attack that allowed the attackers to hide their real target: online wallets storing 1,295 bitcoins, which they successfully stole. At the time, their haul was valued at nearly $1 million. As that haul suggests, the rise in bitcoin-related attacks can be attributed to the bitcoin bubble, which has seen the value of the cryptographic currency rise from a low of $1 per bitcoin in 2011, to $1,200 per bitcoin as of Wednesday. The rise in bitcoin’s value has lead to a number of malicious attacks, as well as a rise in efforts of a different nature. Last week, for example, Malwarebytes researcher Adam Kujawa warned in a blog post that a number of free toolbars and search agents have begun including bitcoin-mining software, which can consume massive amounts of system resources, slowing PCs to a crawl. Bitcoin mining isn’t inherently suspect. In fact, it’s crucial to the success of bitcoins, because it’s what records the chain of bitcoin transactions. Furthermore, the bitcoin system is set up to reward — with bitcoins — anyone who successfully solves related cryptographic puzzles that help maintain the public bitcoin ledger known as the “block chain.” But some people have begun turning PCs into nodes in their personal bitcoin-mining empire, such as online gaming company E-Sports, which was recently hit with a related $325,000 fine by the New Jersey state attorney general’s office. In the case of toolbars and search agents with built-in mining software, however, users who agree to the accompanying end-user license agreement (EULA) might be authorizing a third party to turn their PC into a bitcoin-mining platform. “So take note if your system is running especially slow or if a process is taking up massive amounts of your processing power; it might be malware or even a [potentially unwanted program] running a miner on your system,” said Kujawa at Malwarebytes. “Looks like the bad guys are adapting all of their various technical attacks and business models to the bitcoin world,” CounterHack co-founder and SANS Institute hacking instructor Ed Skoudis said in a recent SANS email newsletter, responding to the Malwarebytes report. “Given the stakes for rapid money-making here, we’ll surely see even more creative bitcoin-related attacks in the near future.” Source: http://www.informationweek.com/security/attacks-and-breaches/bitcoin-password-grab-disguised-as-ddos-attack—-/d/d-id/1112919

Continue Reading:
Bitcoin Password Grab Disguised As DDoS Attack

Ukrainian Interior Ministry Website Reportedly Hit By DDoS Attack

The website Ukraine’s Interior Ministry is currently inaccessible, having apparently fallen foul of a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack by hackers, local media said Sunday. Ukraine’s IT specialists claimed that they were behind the outage, which came after police violently dispersed a pro-EU rally in downtown Kiev Saturday, and promised to take down other Ukrainian government websites, pravda.com.ua reported. “Unfortunately, not each Ukrainian can come to Mykhailivska Square in Kiev or other local squares… That’s why I suggest an efficient way that everyone can show their protest in the Internet… I mean DDoS attack on the sites of our enemies in the government,” IT specialists said in a statement. The report said the Ukrainian government portal, www.kmu.gov.ua, also went out of service Sunday after suspected hacking. Some 35 people were injured after riot police cracked down on protesters camping out in the Independence Square in the capital Kiev Saturday, doctors said. Seven people still remain in hospital. A total of 35 people were briefly detained by police. Protesters regrouped Saturday near a monastery at Mykhailivska Square in downtown Kiev, which became the new place for continuing pro-EU rallies. Activists spent a night there and said they would form a national resistance task force to prepare a nationwide strike. Source: http://en.ria.ru/world/20131201/185186195/Ukrainian-Interior-Ministry-Website-Reportedly-Hit-By-Hackers.html

See the original post:
Ukrainian Interior Ministry Website Reportedly Hit By DDoS Attack

Google Nexus 5 vulnerable to DDoS attack

Google Nexus smartphones including the latest Google Nexus 5 running Android 4.4 KitKat are vulnerable to denial-of-service attack via Flash SMS messages; it has been revealed on Friday during DefCamp security conference in Bucharest, Romania. Bogdan Alecu, a system administrator working with Levi9 – an IT services company, performed a live test during the conference on a Nexus 4 phone running Android 4.3. Alecu showed through the test that after receiving 30 odd Flash messages, the smartphone became unresponsive. During this state the phone neither responded to screen taps nor was it able to receive any phone calls and had to be rebooted manually to get it in functional order. Flash messages are Class 0 SMS that gets displayed on phones’ screen directly without getting stored on the device. Users have the option to saving the message or dismissing it. According to Alecu, there have been instances during this tests that the phone behaves in a different manner at times and loses mobile network connectivity temporarily. The connectivity is restored in a short while with ability to place and receive phone calls, but internet connectivity is lost up until the phone is manually restarted. There are instances when the messaging app crashes and the Nexus smartphone reboots. The issue has been discovered over a year ago revealed Alecu and has been tested on all Google Galaxy Nexus smartphones running Android 4.x including the recently released Nexus 5. Alecu revealed that he has contacted Google multiple times just to receive automated response. Some one did respond that the issue will be resolved in Android 4.3, but unfortunately it still persists and has been passed onto Android 4.4 KitKat. There is no official fix for the vulnerability and till then the only workaround is an app named Class0Firewall (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.silentservices.class0firewall&hl=en) developed by Michael Mueller, an IT security consultant from Germany in collaboration with Alecu. Source: http://www.techienews.co.uk/973439/google-nexus-5-vulnerable-denial-service-attack/

More:
Google Nexus 5 vulnerable to DDoS attack

Anonymous DDoS attack snowballs, affects several Microsoft services

Hacktivist collective Anonymous has taken credit for an attack that unintentionally affected a number of Microsoft services last week. On Monday, members of the loose-knit hacker group posted on Pastebin about how a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack targeting Japanese Microsoft websites and servers had gone awry – resulting in several of the technology giant’s services going down. “A couple days ago a DDoS attack was launched at Japanese Microsoft (Domain) Websites and Servers,” according to the Anonymous post. “We are sorry to report that the Japanese Microsoft Websites and Servers did not go down as planned. Although something did go down. We took the pretty much the entire Microsoft domains down.” It appears the hackers had a motive. “The DDoS attack was launched in response to Taiji…Operation Killing Bay OR #OpKillingBay,” according to the post. Operation Killing Bay is an initiative protesting the slaughter of dolphins in the village of Taiji in Japan – a controversial topic that has gained a lot of coverage in recent years. “It’s the thought that counts right?” the hacktivists wrote, insinuating that they would strike against Taiji again. The claim explains why several people were reporting outages and disruptions of Microsoft services, including microsoft.com, outlook.com, msn.com, office365.com, Microsoft Developer Network, TechNet, SkyDrive, the Windows Store, sites hosted on Windows Azure, xbox.com and Xbox Live. Most of Microsoft’s affected services were restored quickly. Source: http://www.scmagazine.com/anonymous-ddos-attack-snowballs-affects-several-microsoft-services/article/322945/

See the original post:
Anonymous DDoS attack snowballs, affects several Microsoft services

DDos Is Hot, Planning Is Not

Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks continue to plague major corporations today, but half of organizations don’t have a plan or defense against DDoS attacks, a new survey found. Nearly 45 percent of organizations surveyed by Corero have no DDoS response plan, while some 21 percent don’t have a response team set up in the case of a DDoS attack targeting their networks. Around 60 percent say they don’t have a designated DDoS response team, and 40 percent say they don’t have a point of contact within their organizations when a DDoS hits, according to the survey of some 100 respondents. “Half of them aren’t really doing anything about DDoS. They’re just hoping nothing will happen to them, or they [will just be] putting up with inconvenience it’s causing in the meantime,” says Ashley Stephenson, CEO of Corero, which will release full data from the survey next month. Stephenson says he has seen cases where corporations had no idea that their own computing resources were being used in DDoS attacks against them. “A lot of people are not really paying attention to what’s going on, and that’s facilitating the malicious activity going on out there,” he says. More than 54 percent of the organizations surveyed say they have either an out-of-date network diagram of their infrastructures or no diagram at all. Some 66 percent don’t have statistics on network traffic patterns and traffic volume baselines to help identify when a DDoS is brewing. One of the reasons DDoS attacks have become so popular is that they are relatively inexpensive to pull off. “It’s a cheap resource being used to launch the attacks,” Stephenson says. “And the more we invest in good Internet [technology], the greater power is available for third parties to leverage it and do these attacks … [The attackers] are just cataloging all of these vulnerabilities and exploitable resources and calling on them when necessary to affect the attack.” Compromised desktop machines traditionally have been the most popular weapons for DDoSing a target, but, increasingly, attackers are deploying servers for more firepower. “That takes fewer bots but much more powerful [ones],” Stephenson says. A recent report by Dell SecureWorks revealed just how much DDoS-for-hire services cost in the cyberunderground. Those services cost only $3 to $5 per hour and $90 to $100 per day, Dell SecureWorks found. And a weeklong attack goes for $400 to $600. Source: http://www.darkreading.com/attacks-breaches/survey-ddos-is-hot-planning-is-not/240164306?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Read this article:
DDos Is Hot, Planning Is Not

Want Cheaper Bitcoins? Hit Someone With a DDoS Attack

Two months ago, BTC-China was growing fast. It was on a blazing trajectory that would soon see it become the world’s largest Bitcoin exchange. With Bitcoin, the world’s most popular digital currency, in the midst of an tremendous upswing of its own, BTC was on the verge of hitting it very, very big. But before that, there would be the double-barreled rite of passage. First came the extortion attempt, and then the non-stop computer attacks, known as distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks. The extortionists contacted BTC-China in mid-September. Over instant-message chats, they first said they wanted just a few hundred dollars — paid out in bitcoins, naturally — but the demands soon escalated. BTC-China CEO Bobby Lee doesn’t want to get into specifics, but he says that they claimed to have been hired by one of his competitors. He doesn’t believe this, but he thinks that other Bitcoin companies should be concerned. “The DDoS attackers are hitting more and more of us, and it’s going to be a widespread problem,” he says. Since, September, there have been dozens of these attacks on BTC-China. According to Lee, one of them used up a remarkable 100 G/bits per second in bandwidth. “They’re throwing big-time resources into these attacks,” says Marc Gaffan, co-founder of Incapsula, the company that Lee hired to protect his exchange from the criminals. “The attack on BTC-China was one of the largest ever.” Incapsula has about two-dozen clients that are involved in Bitcoin businesses, Gaffin says. A year ago, it had none. CloudFlare, another provider of DDoS protection services has seen a big jump in attacks over the past three months, says Matthew Prince, the company’s CEO. “We’re seeing daily attacks targeting Bitcoin related sites on our network, most of which are relatively small but some get to very high volumes.” Some attacks have even exceeded the 100 G/bits per second volume that hit BTC-China, he says. Yesterday, European payment processor BIPS said it had been hit with a DDoS attack, and then hacked to the tune of nearly 1,300 bitcoins, or $1 million. Last week, Bitstamp, another major Bitcoin Exchange, went offline temporarily. The company has not responded to requests for comment, but it blamed the outage on software and networking issues, not a DDoS. On most websites, hackers can steal credit card numbers or personal information, but these have to be sold somehow. When you break into a Bitcoin business and get access to digital wallets, as was the case with BIPS and an Australian company, Inputs.io, which was hit last month, you’re stealing money itself. “If a Bitcoin wallet can get compromised, then the hackers can actually steal real money and there’s no way to refund the money,” Lee says. In April, Mt. Gox got clobbered via DDoS. The point, the company speculated, was to destabilize Bitcoin, and fuel panic-selling. “?Attackers wait until the price of bitcoins reaches a certain value, sell, destabilize the exchange, wait for everybody to panic-sell their bitcoins, wait for the price to drop to a certain amount, then stop the attack and start buying as much as they can,” Mt. Gox wrote on its website. Gaffan and Lee agree that, in addition to extortion, market manipulation is likely a motive with the recent DDoS attacks too. “It’s about trying to influence the market,” Gaffan says. “We see more Bitcoin exchanges going under attack.” Source: http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2013/11/ddos_bitcoin/

Read the original:
Want Cheaper Bitcoins? Hit Someone With a DDoS Attack

Bitcoin Payment Processor BIPS under DDoS Attack, Over $1m Stolen

Europe’s primary bitcoin payment processor for merchants and free online wallet service, BIPS, was the target of a major DDoS attack and subsequent theft in the past few days that saw 1,295 BTC (just over $1m on CoinDesk’s BPI) stolen. Kris Henriksen, BIPS’ CEO, said most of the missing funds were “from the company’s own holdings”. BIPS uses an algorithm, based on supply and demand, to work out the amount of bitcoins it needs to keep it in a ‘hot wallet’. The heist, however, was apparently not due to any vulnerability in the code itself. He also said merchants who had chosen to instantly convert their bitcoin to fiat currency bank accounts were not affected. Theft The Copenhagen, Denmark-based company was targeted on 15th November by a massive DDoS attack. Then on 17th November, it was followed up by a subsequent attack that disabled the site and “overloaded our managed switches and disconnected the iSCSI connection to the SAN on BIPS servers”. “Regrettably, despite several layers of protection, the attack caused vulnerability to the system, which has then enabled the attacker/s to gain access and compromise several wallets,” the company said in a written statement. BIPS believes the two attacks were connected, and at least the initial DDoS attack was “found to originate from Russia and neighboring countries”. The company moved fast to restore full merchant payment and transfer services by 19th November, but disabled all wallet functions in order to complete a full forensic analysis. Its help desk also went down for a few days, but was restored on 22nd November. Investigation Under BIPS’ privacy policy, it is not allowed to disclose users’ information to anyone, even the authorities. They will now set up a system for affected wallet users to voluntarily sign the required permission documents, to engage in a more thorough investigation with law enforcement to track down the culprits. Henriksen stressed that merchant processing “was restored very quickly, and if you had auto-convert on, there is nothing to worry about”. BIPS’ official statement on its site read: To protect the successful merchant processing business, BIPS has decided to temporarily close down its consumer wallet initiative. BIPS has been a target of a coordinated attack and subsequent security breached. Several consumer wallets have been compromised and BIPS will be contacting the affected users. As a consequence BIPS will temporarily close down the wallet initiative to focus on real-time merchant processing business which does not include storing of bitcoins. Subsequently BIPS will consider to reintroduce the wallet initiative with a re-architected security model. The consumer wallet initiative has not been BIPS’ core business and, as such, regrettably affecting several users has not affected BIPS merchant acquiring. All existing users will be asked to transfer bitcoins to other wallet solutions, and users affected by the security breach will be contacted. Restoration of merchant services did little to comfort individual wallet owners, though. On the Bitcoin Talk forum, several users voiced anger at the prospect of losing their funds, and what they saw as unclear statements from BIPS about exactly what had been stolen, from whom, and how much. One member even created a ‘bips.me potential lawsuit signup form’ for users to input their contact details and number of bitcoins missing, in an effort to prompt a negotiated solution. Though the attack and theft highlights problems that some online wallet services have faced with security, it is significant given BIPS’ comparatively large user base and prominence in the market. As well as online accounts, BIPS had also offered a paper wallet function for those wishing for a safer long-term storage solution. Source: http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-payment-processor-bips-attacked-1m-stolen/

Read the original:
Bitcoin Payment Processor BIPS under DDoS Attack, Over $1m Stolen

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) Targeted for DDoS attack

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty has been targeted in an Internet attack known as a distributed denial of service (DDoS). The attack has disrupted RFE/RL’s global multimedia news and information services intermittently since November 14. Nonetheless, its computer network was working on November 18 and broadcasts have continued normally. The attack has not prevented the public from accessing RFE/RL’s web pages. But it has slowed the ability of RFE/RL’s broadcasting services to upload fresh news stories, photographs, and video to the Internet. RFE/RL President Kevin Klose said information is still being gathered about the attack, but he confirmed that it is believed to be “targeted.” Klose said a decision was taken on November 18 to report on the attack in response to the needs of the broadcasters’ audiences, “who rely on RFE/RL reporting, and who themselves contend with countless obstacles to connect with us every day.” RFE/RL’s content-management system also supports Voice of America, Middle East Broadcasting, and the Office of Cuba Broadcasting. Those U.S. international media networks also have been adversely affected by the attacks but continue to operate. Klose described the attack as “stark evidence of the challenges that confront the free dissemination and exchange of information in this age.” A DDoS attack floods the target with fake requests that come from thousands or even millions of computers that have been compromised or infected with viruses or malware. RFE/RL experienced a more limited DDoS attack against its Belarusian language service in 2008. RFE/RL Director of Technology Luke Springer said the latest attack was discovered on November 14 when hardware for the international media organization’s computer network began receiving many times more requests than normal. At the peak of the attack, the RFE/RL network was receiving requests for data from hundreds of thousands of computers every second. Springer said that means there are probably more than 1 million malware-infected computers being directed by the attackers — most likely without the knowledge of the computer owners. Technical investigations show that nearly 80 percent of the computers sending out requests for data as part of the DDoS attack are in China and nearly 20 percent are in Russia. But Springer said those findings do not indicate who is responsible for the attack. Attempts to make technical changes that counter the attack have temporarily alleviated the problem. But Springer said the attackers also have been changing their methods, allowing them to continue disrupting services intermittently. Springer said the DDoS attack has not damaged RFE/RL’s network equipment. But he says that “filling up the Internet pipeline with so many bogus requests has caused a traffic jam.” RFE/RL is a private, nonprofit organization funded by a grant from the U.S. Congress.

Read the article:
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) Targeted for DDoS attack